Using an LED Mask and a Stimulation Device Together

Medically reviewed by

4 independent reviewers

Andrew Conrad Barile, PT, DPT

Andrew Conrad Barile, PT, DPT

Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) | Licensed Physical Therapist (PT) | CEO and Founder, Xtreem Pulse LLC

Read bio

Dr. Andrew Conrad Barile is a Doctor of Physical Therapy and the CEO and Founder of Xtreem Pulse LLC, the engineering company behind PureLift. He earned his Doctorate in Physical Therapy from Daemen College and is a licensed physical therapist.

He brings over two decades of clinical and entrepreneurial experience across physical therapy, craniosacral therapy and medical device innovation, built on a working knowledge of human anatomy and muscle physiology.

For PureLift LAB he reviews how current is delivered across all ten levels, from sub-sensory nanocurrent and skin-level microcurrent to motor-level EMS, and how the Infuse pass fits into the same ten-minute routine.

Bertica M. Rubio, M.D.

Bertica M. Rubio, M.D.

Board-Certified Physician, Dartmouth Medical School | Medical Director, Antiaging Regenerative Medicine Clinic

Read bio

Dr. Bertica M. Rubio is a board-certified physician and Medical Director of the Antiaging Regenerative Medicine Clinic in Redlands, California. She earned her Doctor of Medicine from Dartmouth Medical School and completed her pediatrics residency at UC Irvine Medical Center.

With decades of clinical experience, she specialises in age management medicine, regenerative medicine, wound healing and growth factor therapies, and her practice integrates evidence-based medical science with advanced aesthetic treatment.

For PureLift LAB she reviews articles for medical accuracy across the whole dial, from the gentle nanocurrent and microcurrent settings through to muscle-level EMS and the Infuse pass.

Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS

Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS

Board-Certified Otolaryngologist | Head and Neck Surgeon | Fellow, American College of Surgeons | Mount Sinai

Read bio

Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS is a board-certified otolaryngologist and head and neck surgeon at ENT and Allergy Associates in West Nyack, New York. He earned his medical degree from Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons.

He completed his otolaryngology residency at New York University Medical Center, serves as Assistant Clinical Professor at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, and is a Fellow of both the American College of Surgeons and the American Academy of Otolaryngology.

For PureLift LAB he brings a wider clinical lens, connecting at-home facial stimulation from microcurrent to EMS to the anatomy underneath, with the same rigour we apply to every device specification.

Prof. Dr. med. Ivo Buschmann

Prof. Dr. med. Ivo Buschmann

Chair of Angiology, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg | Clinic Director, University Clinic for Angiology

Read bio

Prof. Dr. med. Ivo Buschmann is Chair of Angiology at the Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane and Clinic Director of the University Clinic for Angiology at the Brandenburg University Hospital.

He trained at the University of Hamburg, was a Max Planck Society Fellow at the Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, and held senior consultant posts at the Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin before his appointment as Chair in 2016.

One of Europe's leading authorities on arteriogenesis, with over 150 peer-reviewed publications and US and EU patents, he reviews for PureLift LAB how the evidence on electrical stimulation is read and where its limits lie.

What's This About:

A light mask and a stimulation device work on different layers by different mechanisms, so there is no conflict between them.

This article walks through the routine step by step, such as:

- Why there is no conflict

- The order, and why

- What can sit under a mask

- Frequency

- If you own GLOW already

and many more!

A mask also covers the whole face at once, which a handheld light head cannot, so owning both is a reasonable arrangement rather than a redundant one.

Key Points:

Device first, then clean skin, then the mask, is the order that suits most masks.

Most masks are designed for bare skin, so check the instructions for yours before layering anything under it.

Light passes through a thin serum but not through a thick occlusive layer.

Both on the same evening is fine; neither needs a rest day from the other.

Eye protection is the mask's own instruction and it is not optional.

Why there is no conflict

Light of a specific wavelength is absorbed at the skin surface and in the dermis, and the effect depends on the wavelength and the dose. Lee and colleagues ran a split-face LED study worth reading on the category (PMID 17566756).

EMS crosses the motor threshold and contracts muscle, which sits below the fat and the SMAS, several layers deeper. Kavanagh and colleagues measured an 18.6 percent increase in cheek muscle thickness over 12 weeks of motor-level stimulation (10.1111/jocd.12007).

Different layers, different mechanisms, no interaction to manage. What remains is logistics.

The order, and why

Run the device first. It needs a wet serum layer to conduct, and you want that serum off before the mask goes on.

Then cleanse lightly or wipe the serum away, since most masks are designed for clean bare skin and a thick layer of product sits between the light and where it is meant to go.

Then the mask, for whatever duration its instructions specify.

Then your usual moisturiser, and the retinoid later in the evening if you use one.

Running the mask first is not wrong; it just means applying serum afterwards to a face you have already finished with, which most people find more awkward.

What can sit under a mask

Check the instructions for your mask first, since manufacturers differ and some specify bare skin explicitly.

A thin water-based hydrating serum generally passes light without much trouble. A thick cream, an occlusive balm, or anything with mineral sunscreen in it does not, and mineral sunscreen in particular is designed to block light.

Nothing with exfoliating acids or a retinoid under a mask, and nothing you have not tolerated before.

Frequency

Both on the same evening is fine. Neither needs a recovery day from the other, because neither is doing anything to the other's layer.

Follow each one's own instructions for how often. The device session is ten minutes with a maximum of three minutes per side on any PureLift model, and the mask has its own recommended duration.

Doing more of either does not accelerate anything, and doing both back to back does not compound.

If you own GLOW already

GLOW carries red at 634 nm and blue at 465 nm, which is the same category of light in a handheld form.

A mask still adds something, because coverage is the difference: a mask treats the whole face at once while a handheld head treats whatever it is pointed at. If you have both, use GLOW's light for targeted areas and the mask for whole-face sessions.

If you are choosing between them and light is the main thing you want, the mask does that job better and a dedicated mask costs less than the $100 step from Pro Plus to GLOW would suggest.

The safety points

Eye protection is the mask's instruction and it is not a suggestion. GLOW's light must not be used over the eyes or eyelids either, and that is part of its cleared indication rather than a caution.

Blue light is cleared for mild to moderate inflammatory acne and not for severe or cystic acne.

If you have melasma, raise the light specifically with your dermatologist, since visible light is implicated in that condition and the current question and the light question are separate.

For the layer map, see the six layers of the face, and for the model comparison, Pro Plus or GLOW.

Two related questions come up often alongside this one, and we have answered both in full: our GLOW against the Omnilux Contour Face, and our GLOW against the CurrentBody mask.

Back to blog