Every Published Output Figure in This Category, in One Table
Medically reviewed by
4 independent reviewers
Andrew Conrad Barile, PT, DPT
Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) | Licensed Physical Therapist (PT) | CEO and Founder, Xtreem Pulse LLC
Read bio
Dr. Andrew Conrad Barile is a Doctor of Physical Therapy and the CEO and Founder of Xtreem Pulse LLC, the engineering company behind PureLift. He earned his Doctorate in Physical Therapy from Daemen College and is a licensed physical therapist.
He brings over two decades of clinical and entrepreneurial experience across physical therapy, craniosacral therapy and medical device innovation, built on a working knowledge of human anatomy and muscle physiology.
For PureLift LAB he reviews how current is delivered across all ten levels, from sub-sensory nanocurrent and skin-level microcurrent to motor-level EMS, and how the Infuse pass fits into the same ten-minute routine.
Bertica M. Rubio, M.D.
Board-Certified Physician, Dartmouth Medical School | Medical Director, Antiaging Regenerative Medicine Clinic
Read bio
Dr. Bertica M. Rubio is a board-certified physician and Medical Director of the Antiaging Regenerative Medicine Clinic in Redlands, California. She earned her Doctor of Medicine from Dartmouth Medical School and completed her pediatrics residency at UC Irvine Medical Center.
With decades of clinical experience, she specialises in age management medicine, regenerative medicine, wound healing and growth factor therapies, and her practice integrates evidence-based medical science with advanced aesthetic treatment.
For PureLift LAB she reviews articles for medical accuracy across the whole dial, from the gentle nanocurrent and microcurrent settings through to muscle-level EMS and the Infuse pass.
Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS
Board-Certified Otolaryngologist | Head and Neck Surgeon | Fellow, American College of Surgeons | Mount Sinai
Read bio
Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS is a board-certified otolaryngologist and head and neck surgeon at ENT and Allergy Associates in West Nyack, New York. He earned his medical degree from Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons.
He completed his otolaryngology residency at New York University Medical Center, serves as Assistant Clinical Professor at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, and is a Fellow of both the American College of Surgeons and the American Academy of Otolaryngology.
For PureLift LAB he brings a wider clinical lens, connecting at-home facial stimulation from microcurrent to EMS to the anatomy underneath, with the same rigour we apply to every device specification.
Prof. Dr. med. Ivo Buschmann
Chair of Angiology, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg | Clinic Director, University Clinic for Angiology
Read bio
Prof. Dr. med. Ivo Buschmann is Chair of Angiology at the Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane and Clinic Director of the University Clinic for Angiology at the Brandenburg University Hospital.
He trained at the University of Hamburg, was a Max Planck Society Fellow at the Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, and held senior consultant posts at the Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin before his appointment as Chair in 2016.
One of Europe's leading authorities on arteriogenesis, with over 150 peer-reviewed publications and US and EU patents, he reviews for PureLift LAB how the evidence on electrical stimulation is read and where its limits lie.
Share
This is every output figure we could find for 33 devices, with a note on whether the brand publishes it where you buy, files it with the regulator, or does not publish it at all.
This article covers what actually decides the answer, such as:
- which devices publish an output figure on their own page
- which publish one only in a regulatory filing
- which publish nothing at all
- why a figure without a stated load is not comparable
- how to use the table when you are deciding between two devices
and many more!
We will keep this page current, and we will include our own figures in it whether or not they win.
Key Points:
Of 33 devices, six publish an output figure on their own product page and two of those state the load or distance it was measured at.
A further seven publish real figures in their FDA filings and nothing on the page where the device is sold.
The remainder publish wavelengths, LED counts, programme counts and mode names, none of which tell you how hard the device works.
Current devices are listed in milliamps or microamps, light devices in mW/cm2 and J/cm2, and the two groups are not comparable with each other.
PureLift publishes 7 mA at 500 ohms for Face and Pro, 7.7 mA for Pro Edition, 9 mA for Pro Plus and GLOW, with a 4 microsecond pulse width.
How to read the table
Published on page means you can find the figure where the device is sold, without leaving the shop.
Filed only means the number exists in the manufacturer's FDA submission and nowhere on the product page.
Not published means we could not find it in either place.
Load stated matters because current through skin depends on resistance, so a milliamp figure without an ohm figure cannot be lined up against another brand's.
For light devices, the equivalent missing detail is the distance the irradiance was measured at, which no mask brand we examined states.
This comparison sits inside our full map of the category, where we set out all 33 devices we track, what each one carries and what each brand publishes: Nine Technologies on One Dial, What the Rest of the Market Actually Carries.
Current-based devices
| Device | Price | Maximum output | Load stated | Where the figure lives |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PureLift Face | $499 | 7 mA | Yes, 500 ohms | Published on page |
| PureLift Pro | $699 | 7 mA | Yes, 500 ohms | Published on page |
| PureLift Pro Edition | $799 | 7.7 mA | Yes, 500 ohms | Published on page |
| PureLift Pro Plus | $899 | 9 mA | Yes, 500 ohms | Published on page |
| PureLift GLOW | $999 | 9 mA | Yes, 500 ohms | Published on page |
| Ya-Man Medi Lift PLUS | JPY 33,000 | 3.22 mA | Yes, 500 ohms | Filed only |
| FaceGym Pro | $500 | 1,300 to 1,700 Hz, no current figure | No | Partial, frequency only |
| FOREO BEAR 2 | $339 | 680 microamps | No | Published on page |
| Therabody TheraFace PRO | $419.99 | 500 microamps | No | Published on page |
| Skin Gym Microcurrent Wand | $120 | 10 to 500 microamps | No | Published on page |
| 7E MyoLift QT | $229 to $329 | 350 microamps | Yes, 500 ohms | Filed only |
| 7E MyoLift Mini | $329 | 400 microamps | No | Published on page |
| 7E MyoLift 600 Plus | $1,645 | 600 to 650 microamps, sources disagree | No | Published on page |
| NuFACE Trinity+ | $395 | Not published | No | Not published |
| NuFACE MINI+ | $175 to $250 | 335 microamps | No | Filed only |
| ZIIP Halo | $399.99 | 309 microamps | No | Published on page |
| Solawave 4-in-1 | $169 | About 200 microamps | Filing gives 500 ohms | Both |
| Medicube Age-R Booster Pro X2 | $249 | Not published | No | Not published |
| Bio-Therapeutic bt-sculpt GEN2 | About $395 | Not published | No | Not published, filed as Statement |
| Droplette Device Ultra | $250 | No current; no velocity figure | Not applicable | Not published |
Light-based devices
| Device | Price | Irradiance | Delivered dose | Where the figure lives |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PureLift GLOW light layer | $999 | 0.113 mW/cm2 | 0.068 J/cm2 | Published on page |
| Shark CryoGlow | $349.99 | 128 mW/cm2 | Up to 431 J/cm2 | Filed only |
| HigherDOSE Red Light Mask | $349 | 50 mW/cm2 | 30 J/cm2 | Irradiance on page, dose filed |
| Omnilux Contour Face | $395 | About 30 mW/cm2 | Not published | Irradiance on page |
| Silk'n LED Face Mask 100 | $299 | About 28.5 mW/cm2 | Not published | Published on page |
| CurrentBody Series 2 | $569.99 | Not published | 18 J/cm2 | Filed only |
| CurrentBody Series 3 | $569.99 | 13 to 26 mW/cm2 by wavelength | Not published | Filed only |
| Qure Q-Rejuvalight Pro | $399 | 15 to 70 mW/cm2 by mode | Not published | Filed only |
| Solawave 4-in-1 | $169 | 55 mW/cm2 | 9.9 J/cm2 per area | Published on page |
| Dr Dennis Gross FaceWare Pro | $455 | Not published | Not published | Not published |
| FOREO FAQ 202 | $799 | Not published | Not published | Not published |
| Therabody TheraFace Mask | $649.99 | Not published | Not published | Not published |
| FaceGym LIGHTWEAR | $545 | Not published | Not published | Not published |
Laser and radiofrequency devices
| Device | Price | Published output | Where the figure lives |
|---|---|---|---|
| LYMA Laser | GBP 1,999 | 808 nm and 620 nm, about 62.5 mW/cm2 over 8 cm2 | Published on page |
| NIRA Precision | $449 | 1450 nm, power not published | Partial |
| NEWA Skin Therapy System | From $339 | 1 MHz, up to 10 W, 42 C cutoff | Filed only, De Novo |
| TriPollar STOP Vx | About $699 | Not published for the home device | Not published |
| Silk'n Titan MultiPlatform | $549 | 43 C cap only | Not published |
What the table shows
Six devices out of 33 publish an output figure where the device is sold, and two of those state the conditions it was measured under.
Seven more publish genuine engineering to the FDA and nothing to the buyer, which is the single clearest pattern in this category.
The devices that publish nothing at all are spread across every price point, including the most expensive mask in the set.
Nothing in this table proves any device works, and it does show you which brands are willing to be held to a number.
Figures verified on 21 September 2026 against each brand's own published material and the FDA 510(k) database.