Microcurrent for Nasolabial Folds, What Changes and What Does Not
Medically reviewed by
4 independent reviewers
Andrew Conrad Barile, PT, DPT
Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) | Licensed Physical Therapist (PT) | CEO and Founder, Xtreem Pulse LLC
Read bio
Dr. Andrew Conrad Barile is a Doctor of Physical Therapy and the CEO and Founder of Xtreem Pulse LLC, the engineering company behind PureLift. He earned his Doctorate in Physical Therapy from Daemen College and is a licensed physical therapist.
He brings over two decades of clinical and entrepreneurial experience across physical therapy, craniosacral therapy and medical device innovation, built on a working knowledge of human anatomy and muscle physiology.
For PureLift LAB he reviews how current is delivered across all ten levels, from sub-sensory nanocurrent and skin-level microcurrent to motor-level EMS, and how the Infuse pass fits into the same ten-minute routine.
Bertica M. Rubio, M.D.
Board-Certified Physician, Dartmouth Medical School | Medical Director, Antiaging Regenerative Medicine Clinic
Read bio
Dr. Bertica M. Rubio is a board-certified physician and Medical Director of the Antiaging Regenerative Medicine Clinic in Redlands, California. She earned her Doctor of Medicine from Dartmouth Medical School and completed her pediatrics residency at UC Irvine Medical Center.
With decades of clinical experience, she specialises in age management medicine, regenerative medicine, wound healing and growth factor therapies, and her practice integrates evidence-based medical science with advanced aesthetic treatment.
For PureLift LAB she reviews articles for medical accuracy across the whole dial, from the gentle nanocurrent and microcurrent settings through to muscle-level EMS and the Infuse pass.
Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS
Board-Certified Otolaryngologist | Head and Neck Surgeon | Fellow, American College of Surgeons | Mount Sinai
Read bio
Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS is a board-certified otolaryngologist and head and neck surgeon at ENT and Allergy Associates in West Nyack, New York. He earned his medical degree from Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons.
He completed his otolaryngology residency at New York University Medical Center, serves as Assistant Clinical Professor at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, and is a Fellow of both the American College of Surgeons and the American Academy of Otolaryngology.
For PureLift LAB he brings a wider clinical lens, connecting at-home facial stimulation from microcurrent to EMS to the anatomy underneath, with the same rigour we apply to every device specification.
Prof. Dr. med. Ivo Buschmann
Chair of Angiology, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg | Clinic Director, University Clinic for Angiology
Read bio
Prof. Dr. med. Ivo Buschmann is Chair of Angiology at the Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane and Clinic Director of the University Clinic for Angiology at the Brandenburg University Hospital.
He trained at the University of Hamburg, was a Max Planck Society Fellow at the Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, and held senior consultant posts at the Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin before his appointment as Chair in 2016.
One of Europe's leading authorities on arteriogenesis, with over 150 peer-reviewed publications and US and EU patents, he reviews for PureLift LAB how the evidence on electrical stimulation is read and where its limits lie.
Share
Microcurrent does little for a nasolabial fold itself, because the fold is caused by volume sliding downward rather than by muscle losing tone.
This article sets out what to check before you start, such as:
- what actually creates the fold
- why toning the muscle underneath does not erase it
- the one thing a device genuinely helps with here
- what fills a fold and what flattens it
- when the honest answer is an injector
and many more!
We would rather tell you this is the wrong tool for the job than take your money and watch you be disappointed in twelve weeks.
Key Points:
The nasolabial fold is the crease from the side of the nose to the corner of the mouth, and it deepens when the cheek fat pad descends and the skin above it folds over the fixed crease below.
Muscle tone is not the primary driver, which is why the strongest result in this literature, an 18.6 percent cheek muscle thickness gain, does not translate into a filled fold.
Lifting the cheek slightly can soften how the fold reads in certain light, and that is a cosmetic improvement rather than a correction.
Dermal filler placed in the cheek rather than in the fold is the standard correction, and it addresses the cause instead of the crease.
Anyone promising fold removal from a handheld device is selling you something the device does not do.
What actually creates the fold
The nasolabial fold is not a wrinkle in the usual sense; it is the boundary between two zones of the face that sit at different depths.
Above the line sits the cheek fat, which is mobile and which drifts downward over decades as the ligaments holding it loosen and the bone beneath remodels.
Below the line the tissue is tethered more firmly, so it does not move with the cheek, and the mismatch creates a crease that deepens as the gap widens.
That is a structural change in where tissue sits, and no amount of stimulation puts descended fat back where it started.
Why toning does not erase it
Kavanagh and colleagues in 2012 followed 108 women over twelve weeks and reported an 18.6 percent increase in cheek muscle thickness measured by ultrasound at the cheek, which is the strongest finding in this field.
A thicker, better-toned muscle underneath can lift the overlying tissue a little, which is a real effect and a small one relative to the volume that has moved.
The muscle most involved in the area, the levator labii superioris group, lifts the lip rather than supporting the cheek fat pad.
So you can improve the platform without closing the crease, and most people who expected the crease to close end up disappointed by a device that was working as designed.
The one thing a device does help with
Cheek position. A more toned cheek sits marginally higher and fuller, which changes how light falls across the upper edge of the fold.
In practice that reads as a slightly softer transition rather than a shallower crease, and photographs in flat lighting will show less of it than your bathroom mirror does.
The effect builds over the twelve week horizon and reverses when you stop, as we cover in our article on stopping.
If your expectation is set at softer rather than gone, a device is a reasonable part of the routine.
What actually corrects a fold
Dermal filler placed in the cheek to restore the volume that descended, which addresses the cause rather than the crease. Filling the fold directly is a less sophisticated approach and can look heavy.
Fat transfer does the same job with your own tissue and is a surgical procedure.
A midface lift repositions the descended tissue rather than adding to it, which is the most direct correction and the most invasive.
Skin quality treatments, including retinoids and resurfacing, improve the texture around the fold without changing its depth.
Working the area safely
Work upward and outward across the cheek toward the temple rather than pressing into the fold itself.
Keep the level where you can see the cheek respond in the mirror, and no higher, because the tissue near the mouth is sensitive.
If you have had filler in the cheek or the fold, timing is set by your injector and not by us, which we cover in our article on injectable timing.
Our sessions run ten minutes with three minutes per side at most, on all five models.
What we would tell you to buy
If nasolabial folds are your single concern, book a consultation with an injector before you buy any device, because the honest answer is that filler does in twenty minutes what no handheld does in a year.
If folds are one concern among several, and jawline definition and overall tone matter to you too, a device earns its place as part of the routine rather than as the fix for this.
Face at $499 runs the same nanocurrent, microcurrent, EMS and Infuse sequence as every model above it, so the cheaper device is not the weaker one for this job.
The full picture of what each technology does is in our category overview.
This article sits inside our full map of the category, where we set out all 33 devices we track, what each one carries and what each brand publishes: Nine Technologies on One Dial, What the Rest of the Market Actually Carries.