PureLift During Perimenopause and Menopause
Medically reviewed by
4 independent reviewers
Andrew Conrad Barile, PT, DPT
Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) | Licensed Physical Therapist (PT) | CEO and Founder, Xtreem Pulse LLC
Read bio
Dr. Andrew Conrad Barile is a Doctor of Physical Therapy and the CEO and Founder of Xtreem Pulse LLC, the engineering company behind PureLift. He earned his Doctorate in Physical Therapy from Daemen College and is a licensed physical therapist.
He brings over two decades of clinical and entrepreneurial experience across physical therapy, craniosacral therapy and medical device innovation, built on a working knowledge of human anatomy and muscle physiology.
For PureLift LAB he reviews how current is delivered across all ten levels, from sub-sensory nanocurrent and skin-level microcurrent to motor-level EMS, and how the Infuse pass fits into the same ten-minute routine.
Bertica M. Rubio, M.D.
Board-Certified Physician, Dartmouth Medical School | Medical Director, Antiaging Regenerative Medicine Clinic
Read bio
Dr. Bertica M. Rubio is a board-certified physician and Medical Director of the Antiaging Regenerative Medicine Clinic in Redlands, California. She earned her Doctor of Medicine from Dartmouth Medical School and completed her pediatrics residency at UC Irvine Medical Center.
With decades of clinical experience, she specialises in age management medicine, regenerative medicine, wound healing and growth factor therapies, and her practice integrates evidence-based medical science with advanced aesthetic treatment.
For PureLift LAB she reviews articles for medical accuracy across the whole dial, from the gentle nanocurrent and microcurrent settings through to muscle-level EMS and the Infuse pass.
Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS
Board-Certified Otolaryngologist | Head and Neck Surgeon | Fellow, American College of Surgeons | Mount Sinai
Read bio
Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS is a board-certified otolaryngologist and head and neck surgeon at ENT and Allergy Associates in West Nyack, New York. He earned his medical degree from Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons.
He completed his otolaryngology residency at New York University Medical Center, serves as Assistant Clinical Professor at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, and is a Fellow of both the American College of Surgeons and the American Academy of Otolaryngology.
For PureLift LAB he brings a wider clinical lens, connecting at-home facial stimulation from microcurrent to EMS to the anatomy underneath, with the same rigour we apply to every device specification.
Prof. Dr. med. Ivo Buschmann
Chair of Angiology, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg | Clinic Director, University Clinic for Angiology
Read bio
Prof. Dr. med. Ivo Buschmann is Chair of Angiology at the Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane and Clinic Director of the University Clinic for Angiology at the Brandenburg University Hospital.
He trained at the University of Hamburg, was a Max Planck Society Fellow at the Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, and held senior consultant posts at the Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin before his appointment as Chair in 2016.
One of Europe's leading authorities on arteriogenesis, with over 150 peer-reviewed publications and US and EU patents, he reviews for PureLift LAB how the evidence on electrical stimulation is read and where its limits lie.
Share
The face changes during perimenopause and menopause in several layers at once, and a facial device works on one of those layers, which is worth knowing before you buy anything.
This article sorts out which concern belongs to which tool, such as:
- What actually changes in the skin, the fat and the muscle
- Which of those a facial device can reach, and which it cannot
- How to run a session on skin that has become more reactive
- What a realistic timeline looks like
- When the answer is a clinician rather than a device
and many more!
By the end you will know what to expect from a device and what to take somewhere else.
Key Points:
There is no single menopausal face, and the transition arrives at different ages and moves at different speeds for everyone.
A facial device works on the muscle layer, so dryness, pigmentation and volume loss are questions for skincare and for a clinician rather than for a handheld.
Skin often becomes drier and more reactive, so a lower level, a generous serum and a light hand matter more now than before.
Three minutes on each side is the whole session, and the research timeline runs over twelve weeks rather than days.
No trial has tested a PureLift in menopause specifically, and a device is never an alternative to a medical conversation about hormones.
Somewhere in your forties or fifties the mirror starts returning a different answer, and the change often feels faster than the one that came before it.
The useful thing to understand is that several layers of your face are changing at once, and each layer has a different tool, so the disappointment people describe with skincare in these years is often a matter of aiming at the wrong layer rather than of trying hard enough.
There is also no single menopausal face, since the transition begins at different ages, lasts for different lengths of time, and lands differently depending on genetics, sun exposure, weight, sleep and medical history.
What is actually changing
Falling oestrogen exposure is associated with lower skin hydration, changes in elasticity and collagen, and a barrier that is more easily upset, which is why skin that never used to sting suddenly does.
At the same time, and independently of hormones, the fat compartments in the face continue to shift and shrink, the ligaments that hold everything in place loosen, bone changes shape slowly, and the muscles underneath lose tone the way any untrained muscle does.
What you see in the mirror is all of that together, which is why one product rarely answers the whole question.
Matching the concern to the layer
Dryness, tightness and a barrier that reacts to everything belong to skincare, and that is where a good moisturiser and a gentler routine earn their place.
Pigmentation, persistent redness and any skin change you cannot explain belong to a dermatologist, not to a device and not to an article.
Clear volume loss, where the cheek has genuinely emptied rather than softened, is a conversation with a clinician about what fills it.
Muscle tone is the layer a facial EMS device works on, and that is the whole of its remit.
These are not competing choices, they simply answer different questions, and knowing which is which saves both money and disappointment.
What a facial device can do
Around forty small muscles sit under the skin of your face, held inside a connected sheet called the SMAS, and engaging them repeatedly is how EMS supports a firmer, more defined look along the jaw, cheeks and neck with continued use.
In the largest facial trial of its kind, 108 women used daily muscle stimulation for twelve weeks and ultrasound measured an 18.6 percent increase in cheek-muscle thickness, with a clear difference from the untreated group at six weeks (Kavanagh 2012).
A double-blind, sham-controlled trial in adults over 65 found muscle thickness and bite force increased after six weeks (Chang 2020), and CT imaging in a later study showed the muscle around the eye thickening after eight weeks (Okuda 2026).
Those are category studies run with their own devices and none of them was conducted in a menopausal population specifically, so they show what facial muscle stimulation can do rather than what a PureLift will do for you.
The four technologies, and why the gentle end matters now
Every PureLift runs four technologies on one ten-level dial, and the lower half of that dial becomes more useful as skin gets more reactive.
Level 1 is nanocurrent, measured in billionths of an amp, below the level your nerves report, which makes it the setting for a sensitive evening, a first session or the thin skin around the eyes.
Level 2 is microcurrent, the skin-level current most facial toning devices are built around, and small facial studies report smoother texture and softer lines with regular use (Saniee 2012).
Levels 3 to 10 are EMS, where the current crosses the point at which the nerve that drives a facial muscle fires, and that is the muscle work.
After the Lift pass comes Infuse, the electroporation mode, built on delivery science where brief electrical pulses were shown to open temporary routes through the skin's outer barrier (Prausnitz 1993), and it runs gently with your serum still on to support absorption of the serum you already own.
All five models carry all four, so a gentler model is not a lesser one.
Running a session on skin that has become reactive
Use more serum than you think you need, because dragging is the main cause of irritation and a generous layer keeps the device gliding rather than pulling.
Start lower than you would have five years ago, and come up one level at a time across several sessions rather than in one evening.
The level you want is the one where you can see the muscle answer in the mirror, not the highest one you can tolerate, and discomfort is the signal to come down rather than a sign of a better session.
Three minutes on each side of the face is the whole session, about ten minutes including the Infuse pass, and running it longer does not help.
If a retinoid or an acid has left your skin tender, deal with the barrier first and skip the session, since there is no prize for pushing through.
Stop if anything stings, if the skin reddens beyond a light flush, or if a sensation persists after the device is off.
What it will not do
A facial device does not treat menopause, does not replace hormone therapy, and should play no part in whether you start or stop any medical treatment.
It does not restore facial fat, so where volume has genuinely gone, muscle work will not put it back.
It does not detoxify or drain anything in a medical sense, and a session that leaves your face looking refreshed is doing exactly that and no more.
Facial swelling that arrives suddenly, asymmetry, persistent inflammation or any unexplained skin change is a reason to see a clinician rather than to reach for a device.
A realistic timeline
After the first session most people see a fresher, more lifted look straight away, and that change is temporary, like the glow after a walk, because the muscles have worked and blood is flowing.
The lasting change follows the twelve-week clock the trials describe, with the first clear difference around week six, which means the honest advice is to judge it in the spring if you start in the winter.
Take a baseline photograph with a neutral expression in consistent light, then repeat it monthly rather than daily, because sleep, salt, heat and ordinary fluid changes move a face around far more than a week of sessions does.
Nothing about this timeline is tied to your age or to where you are in the transition.
Working alongside professional care
If botulinum toxin, fillers, lasers or peels are part of your plan, ask the clinician who treats you when device use can resume, and follow their answer rather than a general rule from an article.
Anyone with a pacemaker or another implanted electronic device, anyone pregnant, and anyone with epilepsy or a seizure disorder should not use the device at all.
If you are unsure whether a facial device is appropriate for you, ask the clinician who knows your history.
Which model
All five PureLift models run nanocurrent, microcurrent, EMS and Infuse on the same ten-level dial, so the choice is about the top of the dial rather than which technologies you get.
Face at $499 and Pro at $699 reach up to 7 milliamps, Pro Edition at $799 reaches up to 7.7, and Pro Plus + at $899 and GLOW at $999 reach up to 9, all measured at 500 ohms and always written as up to.
GLOW is the only model with light on board, red at 634 nm cleared for the treatment of wrinkles, blue at 465 nm cleared for mild-to-moderate inflammatory acne, and purple, which is red and blue running together, and the acne clearance covers mild to moderate inflammatory acne rather than severe or cystic acne.
The light is never used over the eyes or eyelids.
If your skin has become reactive, the lower-output models are not a compromise, since the gentle end of the dial is identical across the range and you are unlikely to be working near the top of it.
Every model is cleared through the FDA 510(k) pathway, under records K190269 for Face, K230506 for Pro and Pro Edition, K221443 for Pro Plus + and K243587 for GLOW, and clearance is a safety review rather than a promise about results.
All five are made in Japan in an ISO 13485 facility, which is a documented quality standard rather than a guarantee of your outcome.
For what each level feels like in your hand, read what EMS feels like, and for how the technologies compare, read the complete technology guide.
Model figures verified on 8 September 2026 against the PureLift LAB store and FDA records K190269, K230506, K221443 and K243587. Every model runs nanocurrent, microcurrent, EMS and Infuse; consumer copy always says up to. This article is general information about a cosmetic device and is not medical advice.