Do You Need a Facial Device in Your Twenties? Probably Not Yet
Medically reviewed by
4 independent reviewers
Andrew Conrad Barile, PT, DPT
Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) | Licensed Physical Therapist (PT) | CEO and Founder, Xtreem Pulse LLC
Read bio
Dr. Andrew Conrad Barile is a Doctor of Physical Therapy and the CEO and Founder of Xtreem Pulse LLC, the engineering company behind PureLift. He earned his Doctorate in Physical Therapy from Daemen College and is a licensed physical therapist.
He brings over two decades of clinical and entrepreneurial experience across physical therapy, craniosacral therapy and medical device innovation, built on a working knowledge of human anatomy and muscle physiology.
For PureLift LAB he reviews how current is delivered across all ten levels, from sub-sensory nanocurrent and skin-level microcurrent to motor-level EMS, and how the Infuse pass fits into the same ten-minute routine.
Bertica M. Rubio, M.D.
Board-Certified Physician, Dartmouth Medical School | Medical Director, Antiaging Regenerative Medicine Clinic
Read bio
Dr. Bertica M. Rubio is a board-certified physician and Medical Director of the Antiaging Regenerative Medicine Clinic in Redlands, California. She earned her Doctor of Medicine from Dartmouth Medical School and completed her pediatrics residency at UC Irvine Medical Center.
With decades of clinical experience, she specialises in age management medicine, regenerative medicine, wound healing and growth factor therapies, and her practice integrates evidence-based medical science with advanced aesthetic treatment.
For PureLift LAB she reviews articles for medical accuracy across the whole dial, from the gentle nanocurrent and microcurrent settings through to muscle-level EMS and the Infuse pass.
Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS
Board-Certified Otolaryngologist | Head and Neck Surgeon | Fellow, American College of Surgeons | Mount Sinai
Read bio
Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS is a board-certified otolaryngologist and head and neck surgeon at ENT and Allergy Associates in West Nyack, New York. He earned his medical degree from Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons.
He completed his otolaryngology residency at New York University Medical Center, serves as Assistant Clinical Professor at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, and is a Fellow of both the American College of Surgeons and the American Academy of Otolaryngology.
For PureLift LAB he brings a wider clinical lens, connecting at-home facial stimulation from microcurrent to EMS to the anatomy underneath, with the same rigour we apply to every device specification.
Prof. Dr. med. Ivo Buschmann
Chair of Angiology, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg | Clinic Director, University Clinic for Angiology
Read bio
Prof. Dr. med. Ivo Buschmann is Chair of Angiology at the Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane and Clinic Director of the University Clinic for Angiology at the Brandenburg University Hospital.
He trained at the University of Hamburg, was a Max Planck Society Fellow at the Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, and held senior consultant posts at the Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin before his appointment as Chair in 2016.
One of Europe's leading authorities on arteriogenesis, with over 150 peer-reviewed publications and US and EU patents, he reviews for PureLift LAB how the evidence on electrical stimulation is read and where its limits lie.
Share
Facial muscle tone has not meaningfully declined at twenty-five, so the problem a stimulation device addresses mostly is not there yet.
This article walks through the routine step by step, such as:
- What is actually happening at that age
- What genuinely pays off now
- What the research does and does not cover
- The two cases where it does make sense
- If you do start early
and many more!
There are two situations where starting early does make sense, and they are further down.
Key Points:
Daily sunscreen from your twenties prevents more than any device or treatment reverses later.
Collagen starts declining from the mid-twenties, and a retinoid is the evidence-backed answer to that, not current.
No study has tested whether facial stimulation in your twenties prevents anything later.
The research population was women in their forties and fifties, which is who it was measured on.
A device you use for two months and abandon is worse value than no device.
What is actually happening at that age
Collagen production starts falling from the mid-twenties, at roughly one percent a year, and ultraviolet exposure accelerates it far more than time does. That is a dermal change and it is real.
Facial muscle tone, though, has not meaningfully gone anywhere yet. Fat compartments are still where they should be. The bone has not remodelled.
So of the four changes that produce an older-looking face, only one has begun, and it is not the one electrical stimulation addresses.
What genuinely pays off now
Daily broad-spectrum sunscreen. This is the single highest-return habit available at any age and it compounds over decades; the difference between the skin on your forearm and the skin on your inner arm is the difference sun makes to the same tissue.
A retinoid, introduced gently, since it has the best evidence of anything over a counter for dermal collagen and the decline it addresses has started.
Not smoking, sleeping properly, and not baking in the sun on holiday.
Those four cost a fraction of a device and matter considerably more at twenty-five. Recommending them over our own product is not modesty, it is what the evidence supports.
What the research does and does not cover
Kavanagh and colleagues followed 108 women through 12 weeks of motor-level facial stimulation and measured an 18.6 percent increase in cheek muscle thickness (10.1111/jocd.12007). The participants were in the age range where tone had already declined.
No study has tested whether using a stimulation device in your twenties prevents anything in your forties. Nobody has run that trial, and it would take twenty years.
So the preventative argument is inference rather than evidence, and anyone presenting it as established is going beyond what exists.
The two cases where it does make sense
If contour is already your concern rather than a hypothetical one, because faces vary and some people at twenty-eight have the jawline question that others get at forty-five. Treating a problem you actually have is different from preventing one you might.
And if you are building a habit deliberately, since the honest inference from muscle physiology is that tone responds to use, and a routine established at twenty-five and kept is a routine that will be in place when it starts to matter. That is a reason, and it is an inference rather than a finding.
Outside those two, the money is better spent elsewhere.
If you do start early
Face at $499 is the sensible model; 9 mA is more than the situation calls for and paying $400 extra for output you will not use is not clever.
Use the low bands. Levels 1 and 2 are nanocurrent and microcurrent and do not contract anything, and they are where the skin-level research sits, which is the part of the picture that has actually started at your age.
Infuse mode is arguably the more useful half at twenty-five, since a good serum delivered further into the skin addresses the dermal question rather than the muscle one.
Three minutes per side is the maximum on any PureLift model, and more is not better at any age.
The part we would rather you heard
A device bought at twenty-five and abandoned in March is worse value than no device, and the most common outcome of buying one before you need it is exactly that.
Sunscreen every day for the next fifteen years will do more for how your face looks at forty than anything in our range.
For what changes and when, see why the face can look less firm after 40, and for the layer map, the six layers of the face.
Two related questions come up often alongside this one, and we have answered both in full: how microcurrent compares with a TENS unit, and what the microamp and milliamp figures mean.