PureLift Face or Solawave 4-in-1, $499 Against $169
Medically reviewed by
4 independent reviewers
Andrew Conrad Barile, PT, DPT
Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) | Licensed Physical Therapist (PT) | CEO and Founder, Xtreem Pulse LLC
Read bio
Dr. Andrew Conrad Barile is a Doctor of Physical Therapy and the CEO and Founder of Xtreem Pulse LLC, the engineering company behind PureLift. He earned his Doctorate in Physical Therapy from Daemen College and is a licensed physical therapist.
He brings over two decades of clinical and entrepreneurial experience across physical therapy, craniosacral therapy and medical device innovation, built on a working knowledge of human anatomy and muscle physiology.
For PureLift LAB he reviews how current is delivered across all ten levels, from sub-sensory nanocurrent and skin-level microcurrent to motor-level EMS, and how the Infuse pass fits into the same ten-minute routine.
Bertica M. Rubio, M.D.
Board-Certified Physician, Dartmouth Medical School | Medical Director, Antiaging Regenerative Medicine Clinic
Read bio
Dr. Bertica M. Rubio is a board-certified physician and Medical Director of the Antiaging Regenerative Medicine Clinic in Redlands, California. She earned her Doctor of Medicine from Dartmouth Medical School and completed her pediatrics residency at UC Irvine Medical Center.
With decades of clinical experience, she specialises in age management medicine, regenerative medicine, wound healing and growth factor therapies, and her practice integrates evidence-based medical science with advanced aesthetic treatment.
For PureLift LAB she reviews articles for medical accuracy across the whole dial, from the gentle nanocurrent and microcurrent settings through to muscle-level EMS and the Infuse pass.
Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS
Board-Certified Otolaryngologist | Head and Neck Surgeon | Fellow, American College of Surgeons | Mount Sinai
Read bio
Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS is a board-certified otolaryngologist and head and neck surgeon at ENT and Allergy Associates in West Nyack, New York. He earned his medical degree from Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons.
He completed his otolaryngology residency at New York University Medical Center, serves as Assistant Clinical Professor at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, and is a Fellow of both the American College of Surgeons and the American Academy of Otolaryngology.
For PureLift LAB he brings a wider clinical lens, connecting at-home facial stimulation from microcurrent to EMS to the anatomy underneath, with the same rigour we apply to every device specification.
Prof. Dr. med. Ivo Buschmann
Chair of Angiology, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg | Clinic Director, University Clinic for Angiology
Read bio
Prof. Dr. med. Ivo Buschmann is Chair of Angiology at the Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane and Clinic Director of the University Clinic for Angiology at the Brandenburg University Hospital.
He trained at the University of Hamburg, was a Max Planck Society Fellow at the Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, and held senior consultant posts at the Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin before his appointment as Chair in 2016.
One of Europe's leading authorities on arteriogenesis, with over 150 peer-reviewed publications and US and EU patents, he reviews for PureLift LAB how the evidence on electrical stimulation is read and where its limits lie.
Share
Solawave is the most transparent budget device in this category, and its published figures are exactly why it cannot do the job PureLift Face does.
This article compares the two on what decides the result you actually see, such as:
- 200 microamps against 7 milliamps, and what separates them
- why Solawave calls its own current iontophoretic rather than muscular
- the $38 serum that is not in the box
- what 55 mW/cm2 of red light is genuinely good for
- when $169 is the right amount to spend
and many more!
Solawave publishes irradiance, wavelength, current, frequency and temperature, which more expensive brands do not.
Key Points:
Solawave's 4-in-1 wand is $169 and carries red light at 630 nm, warmth, galvanic current and vibration.
Solawave publishes 55 mW/cm2 of irradiance and about 200 microamps at 10.5 Hz, and describes its own current as the kind used in iontophoresis to help products absorb.
Its FDA clearance K232863 shows roughly 0.31 mA at 500 ohms, which is a fraction of a milliamp and nowhere near motor level.
The activating serum is $38 and is not included in the box, and the device needs it for glide and conduction.
PureLift Face is $499, publishes 7 mA at 500 ohms, and carries six technologies including the muscle band Solawave does not enter.
Credit where it belongs
Solawave publishes a technical dossier that names its wavelength, its irradiance, its fluence per session, its current, its frequency and its maximum surface temperature.
It also states plainly that the studies it references on its science page are studies of other devices, not of this wand, which is a level of honesty most of this category does not offer.
It commissioned its own eight-week study through an independent contract research organisation and publishes the report numbers.
We would rather compare ourselves against a brand that publishes than one that does not, because the comparison is then about the devices rather than about who is better at adjectives.
What the published current means
Solawave gives about 200 microamps at 10.5 Hz, and its FDA summary shows roughly 0.31 mA at a 500 ohm load.
The brand's own framing is the important part: it describes the galvanic current as the kind used in iontophoresis to help topical products absorb.
So Solawave is not claiming to work the muscle, and nothing in its material suggests otherwise.
PureLift Face publishes 7 mA at the same 500 ohm load, which is more than twenty times higher, because Face is designed to cross the motor threshold rather than sit below it.
Neither figure is better in the abstract; they describe two different jobs.
The light
Solawave's 630 nm red light at 55 mW/cm2 is a real dose for a handheld, delivering about 9.9 J/cm2 across a three-minute area.
That is considerably more light per square centimetre than GLOW's light layer delivers, and we have said the same about LED masks elsewhere.
What the wand covers is small, so the twelve-minute full routine is four areas of three minutes each.
If red light and a pleasant warm massage are what you want, $169 buys a well-specified version of exactly that.
The cost after the box
The LightBoost activating serum is $38 and is not included, and Solawave describes it as what conducts the current and gives the wand its glide.
Solawave does not publish the bottle size or how long one lasts, so we cannot give you an honest annual figure, and neither can anyone else.
A conductive serum is not chemically exotic, so a plain water-based serum will conduct, though the brand's own study was run with its serum.
PureLift works with any water-based serum you already own, which keeps that number in your hands.
What Face adds
PureLift Face carries six technologies on one ten-level dial: Infusion, iontophoresis, nanocurrent at level 1, microcurrent at level 2, EMS from level 3 and PDM underneath.
Levels 1 and 2 cover the calm band, then eight levels above it ask the muscle to contract, which you can see in the mirror.
Kavanagh and colleagues measured an 18.6 percent increase in cheek muscle thickness over twelve weeks of motor-level stimulation (10.1111/jocd.12007), and that is the band Face operates in rather than the band Solawave does.
Face is cleared under K190269 and made in Japan in an ISO 13485 facility; Solawave's clearance sits with its manufacturer, Shenzhen Kaiyan, which is normal and traceable.
Which one to buy
Buy the Solawave wand if red light, warmth and better serum absorption are what you are after, if $169 is the budget, and if you want a brand that shows its working.
Buy PureLift Face if the lower face has started to drop, because that is a muscle question and a 200 microamp galvanic current is not an answer to it.
Owning both is not silly either, since the wand's light and the Face's muscle work do not overlap at any point.
This comparison sits inside our full map of the category, where we set out all 33 devices we track, what each one carries and what each brand publishes: Nine Technologies on One Dial, What the Rest of the Market Actually Carries.
Prices and specifications verified on 21 September 2026 against each brand's own published material and the FDA 510(k) database.