EMS or Microcurrent, Which Is Right for Your Face
Medically reviewed by
4 independent reviewers
Andrew Conrad Barile, PT, DPT
Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) | Licensed Physical Therapist (PT) | CEO and Founder, Xtreem Pulse LLC
Read bio
Dr. Andrew Conrad Barile is a Doctor of Physical Therapy and the CEO and Founder of Xtreem Pulse LLC, the engineering company behind PureLift. He earned his Doctorate in Physical Therapy from Daemen College and is a licensed physical therapist.
He brings over two decades of clinical and entrepreneurial experience across physical therapy, craniosacral therapy and medical device innovation, built on a working knowledge of human anatomy and muscle physiology.
For PureLift LAB he reviews how current is delivered across all ten levels, from sub-sensory nanocurrent and skin-level microcurrent to motor-level EMS, and how the Infuse pass fits into the same ten-minute routine.
Bertica M. Rubio, M.D.
Board-Certified Physician, Dartmouth Medical School | Medical Director, Antiaging Regenerative Medicine Clinic
Read bio
Dr. Bertica M. Rubio is a board-certified physician and Medical Director of the Antiaging Regenerative Medicine Clinic in Redlands, California. She earned her Doctor of Medicine from Dartmouth Medical School and completed her pediatrics residency at UC Irvine Medical Center.
With decades of clinical experience, she specialises in age management medicine, regenerative medicine, wound healing and growth factor therapies, and her practice integrates evidence-based medical science with advanced aesthetic treatment.
For PureLift LAB she reviews articles for medical accuracy across the whole dial, from the gentle nanocurrent and microcurrent settings through to muscle-level EMS and the Infuse pass.
Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS
Board-Certified Otolaryngologist | Head and Neck Surgeon | Fellow, American College of Surgeons | Mount Sinai
Read bio
Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS is a board-certified otolaryngologist and head and neck surgeon at ENT and Allergy Associates in West Nyack, New York. He earned his medical degree from Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons.
He completed his otolaryngology residency at New York University Medical Center, serves as Assistant Clinical Professor at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, and is a Fellow of both the American College of Surgeons and the American Academy of Otolaryngology.
For PureLift LAB he brings a wider clinical lens, connecting at-home facial stimulation from microcurrent to EMS to the anatomy underneath, with the same rigour we apply to every device specification.
Prof. Dr. med. Ivo Buschmann
Chair of Angiology, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg | Clinic Director, University Clinic for Angiology
Read bio
Prof. Dr. med. Ivo Buschmann is Chair of Angiology at the Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane and Clinic Director of the University Clinic for Angiology at the Brandenburg University Hospital.
He trained at the University of Hamburg, was a Max Planck Society Fellow at the Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, and held senior consultant posts at the Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin before his appointment as Chair in 2016.
One of Europe's leading authorities on arteriogenesis, with over 150 peer-reviewed publications and US and EU patents, he reviews for PureLift LAB how the evidence on electrical stimulation is read and where its limits lie.
Share
The right answer depends on what is actually bothering you when you look in the mirror, not on which technology sounds more advanced.
This page matches the concern to the technology, such as:
- Dullness, rough texture and fine lines
- A softening jawline and flattening cheeks
- Reactive or sensitive skin
- Getting more from the serum you already own
and many more!
If your honest answer is more than one of those, that is the case for a device carrying both.
Key Points:
Texture, dullness and fine lines are skin-layer concerns, which is microcurrent territory.
A softening jawline lives in the muscle layer, which needs EMS to reach it.
Most devices sold as microcurrent cannot cross into muscle work at any setting.
Kwak 2023 ran both on one face and found each improved a different measure.
On a PureLift both sit on one dial, microcurrent at level 2 and EMS from level 3.
Start with the concern, not the technology
Your face is built in layers, skin on top, then fat in compartments, then a connected sheet of tissue holding around forty small muscles, all on bone.
Different complaints live in different layers, and a technology that reaches the wrong layer will not help however good it is at its own job.
So the useful question is not which technology wins, it is which layer your problem is in.
If the concern is texture, dullness or fine lines
All three sit in the skin, and microcurrent is the technology built for that layer, delivering current in millionths of an amp.
Laboratory work shows defined small currents change how skin cells behave, and small facial studies report smoother texture and softer lines with regular use (Saniee 2012).
If that is the whole of your complaint, a good microcurrent device will serve you and there is no need to spend more for muscle work you will not use.
If the concern is a softening jawline
Jowls, a blurring jawline and flattening cheeks are shaped by what is underneath the skin rather than by the skin itself, and muscle is one of the contributors.
Reaching muscle needs enough current to fire the motor nerve, which is the motor threshold, the point where a tingle becomes a visible contraction (Ward 2009).
Kavanagh 2012 measured an 18.6 percent increase in cheek-muscle thickness in 108 women after twelve weeks of daily facial muscle stimulation, confirmed by ultrasound against an untreated group (Kavanagh 2012).
Being straight about the limit, muscle is one contributor among several, since fat compartments, retaining ligaments, skin quality and bone are all changing too, and no home device touches any of those.
Why most devices force the choice
Published output tells you which side of the line a device sits on. FOREO BEAR 2 reaches 680 microamps, Therabody TheraFace PRO 500, ZIIP Halo 309 and NuFACE Trinity+ between 170 and 200.
Every one of those stays below the motor threshold across its whole dial, so a buyer with a jawline concern is choosing a device that cannot reach the layer the concern lives in.
NuFACE, ZIIP and Therabody publish no output figure on their own product pages, so those numbers come from their FDA clearance documents rather than from the brands.
What the split-face study showed
One study applied microcurrent to one side of a face and EMS to the other, which removes almost every variable that usually muddies a comparison.
The microcurrent side improved eye-wrinkle volume and dermal density, and the EMS side improved lifting measures (Kwak 2023).
Neither side won, and each did the job its physics allows, which is the answer to the question in this article's title.
If your answer is both
Most people, asked honestly, name something in the skin and something in the structure, which is the case for one device covering both layers.
Every PureLift model runs nanocurrent at level 1 for the gentlest days, microcurrent at level 2, and EMS from level 3 to 10 where the contraction begins, on a single dial.
There is also the Infuse pass, which runs two delivery technologies on the serum already on your skin, Infusion built on electroporation (Prausnitz 1993) and iontophoresis moving charged ingredients inward.
That combination starts at $499 on PureLift Face, and our September 2026 review of current-based home devices between $249 and $1,100 found no other device combining nanocurrent, microcurrent, muscle-contracting EMS and a serum-absorption mode in one handheld.
What either choice asks of you
Three minutes on each side, about ten minutes in total including Infuse, on clean skin with a water-based conductive serum.
Four sessions a week for twelve weeks, judged on photographs taken three months apart under matched light, camera and expression rather than on the mirror each morning.
Whichever technology suits your concern, consistency is what turns it into a result, and it is the only variable on this page you fully control.