Pros and Cons of Microcurrent Facials and Devices
Medically reviewed by
4 independent reviewers
Andrew Conrad Barile, PT, DPT
Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) | Licensed Physical Therapist (PT) | CEO and Founder, Xtreem Pulse LLC
Read bio
Dr. Andrew Conrad Barile is a Doctor of Physical Therapy and the CEO and Founder of Xtreem Pulse LLC, the engineering company behind PureLift. He earned his Doctorate in Physical Therapy from Daemen College and is a licensed physical therapist.
He brings over two decades of clinical and entrepreneurial experience across physical therapy, craniosacral therapy and medical device innovation, built on a working knowledge of human anatomy and muscle physiology.
For PureLift LAB he reviews how current is delivered across all ten levels, from sub-sensory nanocurrent and skin-level microcurrent to motor-level EMS, and how the Infuse pass fits into the same ten-minute routine.
Bertica M. Rubio, M.D.
Board-Certified Physician, Dartmouth Medical School | Medical Director, Antiaging Regenerative Medicine Clinic
Read bio
Dr. Bertica M. Rubio is a board-certified physician and Medical Director of the Antiaging Regenerative Medicine Clinic in Redlands, California. She earned her Doctor of Medicine from Dartmouth Medical School and completed her pediatrics residency at UC Irvine Medical Center.
With decades of clinical experience, she specialises in age management medicine, regenerative medicine, wound healing and growth factor therapies, and her practice integrates evidence-based medical science with advanced aesthetic treatment.
For PureLift LAB she reviews articles for medical accuracy across the whole dial, from the gentle nanocurrent and microcurrent settings through to muscle-level EMS and the Infuse pass.
Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS
Board-Certified Otolaryngologist | Head and Neck Surgeon | Fellow, American College of Surgeons | Mount Sinai
Read bio
Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS is a board-certified otolaryngologist and head and neck surgeon at ENT and Allergy Associates in West Nyack, New York. He earned his medical degree from Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons.
He completed his otolaryngology residency at New York University Medical Center, serves as Assistant Clinical Professor at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, and is a Fellow of both the American College of Surgeons and the American Academy of Otolaryngology.
For PureLift LAB he brings a wider clinical lens, connecting at-home facial stimulation from microcurrent to EMS to the anatomy underneath, with the same rigour we apply to every device specification.
Prof. Dr. med. Ivo Buschmann
Chair of Angiology, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg | Clinic Director, University Clinic for Angiology
Read bio
Prof. Dr. med. Ivo Buschmann is Chair of Angiology at the Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane and Clinic Director of the University Clinic for Angiology at the Brandenburg University Hospital.
He trained at the University of Hamburg, was a Max Planck Society Fellow at the Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, and held senior consultant posts at the Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin before his appointment as Chair in 2016.
One of Europe's leading authorities on arteriogenesis, with over 150 peer-reviewed publications and US and EU patents, he reviews for PureLift LAB how the evidence on electrical stimulation is read and where its limits lie.
Share
Microcurrent's main advantages are no downtime, no pain, suitability for most skin types and the option to do it at home, while its main drawbacks are that results need regular sessions to build and hold, changes are subtle rather than dramatic, and it does not fix deep laxity, volume loss or pigment.
This list covers both sides, such as:
- the main advantages
- the main drawbacks
- who it suits best
- what it costs over time
- how it compares with clinic treatments
and many more!
We make microcurrent devices, and we would rather you buy one knowing its limits than be disappointed.
Key Points:
The biggest advantage is comfort, with no needles, heat, downtime or pain, and it suits all skin tones.
It can be done at home in ten minutes, several times a week.
The biggest drawback is commitment, because results are subtle, build over weeks and fade if you stop.
It does not treat deep laxity, volume loss, pigment or texture.
It is not suitable for people with pacemakers, epilepsy or during pregnancy.
The advantages
No downtime and no pain
Most people feel a light tingle or nothing, there is no redness, and you can put makeup on straight afterward. That makes it easy to fit before work or an event.
Suitable for most skin
Microcurrent does not rely on pigment or heat, so skin tone is not a limit, and it is gentle enough for many people with sensitive skin when used with a good gel.
Home use
A home device makes the frequent sessions microcurrent needs practical, and a randomized controlled trial by Kavanagh and colleagues, published in 2012, measured the effect of facial electrical stimulation after twelve weeks of regular use.
Works alongside other treatments
It complements skincare, LED, injectables and clinic treatments, as long as you follow timing advice after procedures.
The drawbacks
Commitment
Results come from regular sessions, often four or five a week to start, then a maintenance routine. If you stop, the effect fades over weeks. See our article on what happens when you stop.
Subtle results
Expect a fresher, firmer, more lifted look, not a surgical change. Realistic timelines are in our week by week results article.
Limits
It does not replace lost volume, tighten very loose skin, remove fat or fade pigment.
Contraindications
It is not for people with a pacemaker or implanted electronic device, epilepsy or during pregnancy.
At a glance
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| No downtime, no pain | Needs regular sessions |
| All skin tones | Subtle, gradual results |
| Ten minutes at home | Fades if you stop |
| Works alongside other treatments | Does not fix deep laxity, volume loss or pigment |
Cost over time
A clinic microcurrent series is usually priced per session, while a home device is a one-time cost plus gel or serum. Over a year of regular use, a device usually works out cheaper. The math is in our salon vs device cost article and our are microcurrent devices worth it article.
Who it suits best
People with early softening along the jaw, cheeks and brows who want a no-downtime routine, people maintaining results between clinic treatments, and anyone who prefers a gradual, natural-looking change. More on ideal candidates is in our who is microcurrent best for article.
Our devices run nanocurrent at level 1, microcurrent at level 2 and EMS from level 3 to 10, plus an Infuse pass, on one dial, with three minutes per side of the face as the sweet spot, and no more than five minutes per side, ten minutes in total, and they work with any water-based conductive serum.
Do not use any facial current device if you have a pacemaker or other implanted electronic device, if you are pregnant or if you have epilepsy, and skip broken or irritated skin. The full list is in our safety article.
Frequently asked questions
What are the benefits of microcurrent
No downtime or pain, suitability for most skin, and a firmer, more lifted look with regular use, including at home.
What are the downsides of microcurrent
It needs regular sessions, results are subtle and fade if you stop, and it does not fix deep laxity, volume loss or pigment.
Is microcurrent worth it
For people who want a gradual, no-downtime routine and can commit to regular sessions, yes.
Is microcurrent safe
For most people, yes, but not with a pacemaker, epilepsy or during pregnancy.
Is a home device better than salon microcurrent
A home device makes frequent sessions practical and usually costs less over a year.
This article sits inside our full map of the category, where we set out all 33 devices we track, what each one carries and what each brand publishes: Nine Technologies on One Dial, What the Rest of the Market Actually Carries.