Facial Devices and Injectables, Ask Your Injector First
Medically reviewed by
4 independent reviewers
Andrew Conrad Barile, Fisioterapeuta, Doctor en Terapia Física
Doctorado en Terapia Física (DPT), Fisioterapeuta Licenciado (PT)
Read bio
El Dr. Andrew Conrad Barile es Doctor en Terapia Física y CEO y Fundador de Xtreem Pulse LLC. Obtuvo su Doctorado en Terapia Física en Daemen College y aporta más de dos décadas de experiencia clínica y empresarial en terapia física pediátrica, terapia craneosacral e innovación en dispositivos médicos. Su profundo conocimiento de la anatomía humana, la fisiología muscular y la tecnología terapéutica ofrece un enfoque invaluable respaldado por la ciencia para la rejuvenecimiento facial y soluciones antienvejecimiento.
Bertica M. Rubio, M.D.
Director Médico, Clínica de Medicina Regenerativa y Antienvejecimiento | Médico Certificado por la Junta | Escuela de Medicina de Dartmouth
Read bio
La Dra. Bertica M. Rubio es una médica certificada y Directora Médica de la Clínica de Medicina Regenerativa y Antienvejecimiento en Redlands, California. Obtuvo su licenciatura en Ciencias en la Universidad Loyola Marymount y su título de Doctora en Medicina en la Escuela de Medicina de Dartmouth (Geisel School of Medicine). Completó su residencia en pediatría en el Centro Médico UC Irvine.
Con décadas de experiencia clínica, la Dra. Rubio se especializa en medicina para el manejo de la edad, medicina regenerativa, cicatrización de heridas y terapias con factores de crecimiento. Su práctica integra la ciencia médica basada en evidencia con tratamientos estéticos y regenerativos avanzados, ayudando a los pacientes a alcanzar una salud óptima y vitalidad juvenil.
La Dra. Rubio siente pasión por educar a los pacientes sobre la ciencia detrás del cuidado de la piel, el rejuvenecimiento facial y las tecnologías no invasivas como EMS (Estimulación Eléctrica Muscular) para el tonificado facial. Sus artículos para PureLift LAB combinan un conocimiento médico riguroso con orientación práctica para lograr resultados reales y duraderos.
Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS
Otorrinolaringólogo y cirujano de cabeza y cuello certificado | Miembro, Colegio Americano de Cirujanos | Profesor clínico asistente, Escuela de Medicina Mount Sinai
Read bio
Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS, es un otorrinolaringólogo certificado por la junta y cirujano de cabeza y cuello en ENT and Allergy Associates en West Nyack, NY. Obtuvo su título de médico en la Facultad de Médicos y Cirujanos de la Universidad de Columbia, completó su residencia en Otorrinolaringología en el Centro Médico de la Universidad de Nueva York y es profesor clínico asistente en la Escuela de Medicina Mount Sinai. Es miembro de la American College of Surgeons y de la American Academy of Otolaryngology.
La perspectiva quirúrgica de cabeza y cuello del Dr. Grinberg ofrece a los lectores de PureLift LAB una visión clínica más amplia, conectando la práctica de EMS en casa con la anatomía médica subyacente con el mismo rigor científico que aplicamos a cada especificación del dispositivo.
Prof. Dr. med. Ivo Buschmann
Cátedra de Angiología, Hochschule Médica de Brandeburgo | Director de Clínica, Clínica Universitaria de Angiología, Hospital Universitario de Brandeburgo | Ex Consultor Senior, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlín
Read bio
El Prof. Dr. med. Ivo Buschmann es Catedrático de Angiología en la Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane (MHB) y Director Clínico de la Clínica Universitaria de Angiología en el Hospital Universitario de Brandeburgo. Completó su formación médica en la Universidad de Hamburgo, fue becario de la Sociedad Max-Planck en el Instituto Max-Planck de Investigación Cardiaca y Pulmonar, y ocupó cargos de consultor senior en la Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Virchow antes de ser nombrado Catedrático en la MHB en 2016.
El Prof. Buschmann es una de las principales autoridades europeas en arteriogénesis — el crecimiento y remodelación de los vasos sanguíneos impulsados por el flujo — con más de 150 publicaciones revisadas por pares y varias patentes en EE. UU. y la UE sobre dispositivos que estimulan el crecimiento de vasos colaterales mediante terapia controlada de tasa de cizalladura. Su investigación conecta la estimulación mecánica y eléctrica con la adaptación vascular, la microcirculación y la perfusión tisular.
Las contribuciones del Prof. Buschmann aportan a los lectores de PureLift LAB una perspectiva de biología vascular que complementa nuestra autoría clínica, de fisioterapia y de anatomía quirúrgica existente — explicando cómo la estimulación EMS activa no solo los músculos faciales sino también la microcirculación que los abastece, y por qué la administración inteligente es tan importante a nivel del flujo sanguíneo como en la contracción muscular.
Compartir
A neuromodulator relaxes a muscle and EMS contracts one, which is a real reason to think carefully about combining them.
This article sets out what to check before you start, such as:
- Why the question is a real one
- What is actually known
- Why your injector is the right person to ask
- Treated areas and untreated areas
- If you cannot reach them
and many more!
The person who performed your treatment knows what was injected, where, and how much, and that is who decides.
Key Points:
Ask your injector before your next appointment rather than afterwards, so the answer arrives before the question is urgent.
Injectors routinely give aftercare instructions about pressure and massage; those instructions govern.
The treated area and the untreated areas are separate questions.
Nothing here is medical advice and none of it overrides what your clinician tells you.
If you cannot reach your injector, waiting is the conservative choice and costs you very little.
Why the question is a real one
A neuromodulator works by preventing a muscle from contracting. EMS works by making a muscle contract. Those are opposing actions on the same tissue, which is enough to make anyone pause before doing both in the same week.
Fillers raise a different question again, since they are placed volume that sits in tissue and settles over days, and pressure applied over a fresh placement is something injectors already have views about.
Both questions are legitimate, and neither has a published answer for facial devices specifically.
What is actually known
The facial stimulation research, Kavanagh and colleagues over 12 weeks (10.1111/jocd.12007) and Chang and colleagues in a sham-controlled design (10.3390/ijerph17113783), studied stimulation on its own. None of it involved injectables.
So there is no interval anyone can quote from evidence, and a page that gives you a confident number of weeks has invented it.
What does exist is the aftercare guidance injectors give routinely, which typically covers pressure, massage, heat and exercise for a period after treatment. That guidance is the relevant instruction, and it is written for what you specifically had done.
Why your injector is the right person to ask
They know the product, the dose, the exact placement and the depth, and those four determine how much any of this matters.
They also know how your treatment has behaved previously, which is information no general article has.
Ask before your next appointment rather than after it, since a question asked in the chair is answered calmly and a question asked at eleven at night with a device in your hand is not.
Bring the specifics: which device, what output, which areas you work, and how often. "A facial EMS device at up to 9 mA, ten minutes, four times a week, jaw and cheek" is a question they can answer; "a beauty gadget" is not.
Treated areas and untreated areas
These are separate questions and worth asking separately.
Your injector may be comfortable with you working an untreated area while asking you to leave a treated one alone, or may prefer you pause entirely for a period. Either answer is reasonable and neither is one we can give you.
If you are told to avoid an area, avoid it rather than working around the edge of it.
If you cannot reach them
Waiting is the conservative option, and the cost of waiting a week or two is close to nothing. Kavanagh's protocol ran twelve weeks, so this is not a routine where a fortnight's pause undoes anything.
Do not split the difference by using the device at a lower level as a compromise, since that is a guess dressed as caution.
Resume once you have an answer, at your usual level, rather than doing extra to make up for the pause. Three minutes per side is the maximum on any PureLift model whatever else is going on.
What we are not going to tell you
We are not going to publish a number of days, because we do not know it and neither does anyone else selling a facial device.
We are not going to suggest that a device enhances, extends or complements an injectable treatment, since no study supports any of those three.
And we are not going to imply that a device is an alternative to an injectable; a neuromodulator relaxes a specific muscle and a filler replaces volume, and no current does either.
For what a device does reach, see the six layers of the face.
This is general information and not medical advice. Questions about your own treatment belong with the clinician who performed it.
Two related questions come up often alongside this one, and we have answered both in full: the timing around botox and fillers, and the full safety picture, including who should not use one.