PureLift vs Ya-Man Medi Lift PLUS, Two Real EMS Devices Compared

Medically reviewed by

4 independent reviewers

Andrew Conrad Barile, Fisioterapeuta, Doctor en Terapia Física

Andrew Conrad Barile, Fisioterapeuta, Doctor en Terapia Física

Doctorado en Terapia Física (DPT), Fisioterapeuta Licenciado (PT)

Read bio

El Dr. Andrew Conrad Barile es Doctor en Terapia Física y CEO y Fundador de Xtreem Pulse LLC. Obtuvo su Doctorado en Terapia Física en Daemen College y aporta más de dos décadas de experiencia clínica y empresarial en terapia física pediátrica, terapia craneosacral e innovación en dispositivos médicos. Su profundo conocimiento de la anatomía humana, la fisiología muscular y la tecnología terapéutica ofrece un enfoque invaluable respaldado por la ciencia para la rejuvenecimiento facial y soluciones antienvejecimiento.

Bertica M. Rubio, M.D.

Bertica M. Rubio, M.D.

Director Médico, Clínica de Medicina Regenerativa y Antienvejecimiento | Médico Certificado por la Junta | Escuela de Medicina de Dartmouth

Read bio

La Dra. Bertica M. Rubio es una médica certificada y Directora Médica de la Clínica de Medicina Regenerativa y Antienvejecimiento en Redlands, California. Obtuvo su licenciatura en Ciencias en la Universidad Loyola Marymount y su título de Doctora en Medicina en la Escuela de Medicina de Dartmouth (Geisel School of Medicine). Completó su residencia en pediatría en el Centro Médico UC Irvine.

Con décadas de experiencia clínica, la Dra. Rubio se especializa en medicina para el manejo de la edad, medicina regenerativa, cicatrización de heridas y terapias con factores de crecimiento. Su práctica integra la ciencia médica basada en evidencia con tratamientos estéticos y regenerativos avanzados, ayudando a los pacientes a alcanzar una salud óptima y vitalidad juvenil.

La Dra. Rubio siente pasión por educar a los pacientes sobre la ciencia detrás del cuidado de la piel, el rejuvenecimiento facial y las tecnologías no invasivas como EMS (Estimulación Eléctrica Muscular) para el tonificado facial. Sus artículos para PureLift LAB combinan un conocimiento médico riguroso con orientación práctica para lograr resultados reales y duraderos.

Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS

Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS

Otorrinolaringólogo y cirujano de cabeza y cuello certificado | Miembro, Colegio Americano de Cirujanos | Profesor clínico asistente, Escuela de Medicina Mount Sinai

Read bio

Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS, es un otorrinolaringólogo certificado por la junta y cirujano de cabeza y cuello en ENT and Allergy Associates en West Nyack, NY. Obtuvo su título de médico en la Facultad de Médicos y Cirujanos de la Universidad de Columbia, completó su residencia en Otorrinolaringología en el Centro Médico de la Universidad de Nueva York y es profesor clínico asistente en la Escuela de Medicina Mount Sinai. Es miembro de la American College of Surgeons y de la American Academy of Otolaryngology.

La perspectiva quirúrgica de cabeza y cuello del Dr. Grinberg ofrece a los lectores de PureLift LAB una visión clínica más amplia, conectando la práctica de EMS en casa con la anatomía médica subyacente con el mismo rigor científico que aplicamos a cada especificación del dispositivo.

Prof. Dr. med. Ivo Buschmann

Prof. Dr. med. Ivo Buschmann

Cátedra de Angiología, Hochschule Médica de Brandeburgo | Director de Clínica, Clínica Universitaria de Angiología, Hospital Universitario de Brandeburgo | Ex Consultor Senior, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlín

Read bio

El Prof. Dr. med. Ivo Buschmann es Catedrático de Angiología en la Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane (MHB) y Director Clínico de la Clínica Universitaria de Angiología en el Hospital Universitario de Brandeburgo. Completó su formación médica en la Universidad de Hamburgo, fue becario de la Sociedad Max-Planck en el Instituto Max-Planck de Investigación Cardiaca y Pulmonar, y ocupó cargos de consultor senior en la Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Virchow antes de ser nombrado Catedrático en la MHB en 2016.

El Prof. Buschmann es una de las principales autoridades europeas en arteriogénesis — el crecimiento y remodelación de los vasos sanguíneos impulsados por el flujo — con más de 150 publicaciones revisadas por pares y varias patentes en EE. UU. y la UE sobre dispositivos que estimulan el crecimiento de vasos colaterales mediante terapia controlada de tasa de cizalladura. Su investigación conecta la estimulación mecánica y eléctrica con la adaptación vascular, la microcirculación y la perfusión tisular.

Las contribuciones del Prof. Buschmann aportan a los lectores de PureLift LAB una perspectiva de biología vascular que complementa nuestra autoría clínica, de fisioterapia y de anatomía quirúrgica existente — explicando cómo la estimulación EMS activa no solo los músculos faciales sino también la microcirculación que los abastece, y por qué la administración inteligente es tan importante a nivel del flujo sanguíneo como en la contracción muscular.

What's This About:

Ya-Man's Medi Lift PLUS is the only other real EMS device in this category, and the comparison comes down to a hands-free mask on the cheeks against a probe you move over the whole face.

This article compares the two on what decides the result you actually see, such as:

- 3.22 mA against 7 mA, both measured at the same 500 ohm load

- what six fixed electrodes on the cheeks can and cannot reach

- why hands-free is a real advantage and what it costs you

- what Ya-Man publishes to the FDA but not on its own product page

- whether you can actually buy the PLUS in the United States

and many more!

Both devices are Japanese, both run ten minutes, and both genuinely contract muscle, which is rarer than the category suggests.

Key Points:

Medi Lift PLUS is real EMS, not microcurrent, and it is one of very few competitors we take seriously on that basis.

Its FDA filing publishes a maximum of 3.22 mA at 500 ohms; PureLift Face publishes 7 mA at the same load and Pro Plus publishes 9 mA.

The mask holds six fixed electrodes over the cheeks, so the forehead, the eye area and most of the jawline get nothing.

It sells for ¥33,000 in Japan and Ya-Man does not list it in its US range, so American buyers are importing.

It carries EMS and nothing else, with one mode and a fixed ten-minute timer, against six technologies and ten levels on PureLift Face at $499.

Why this comparison is different from the others

Most devices we are compared with run microcurrent, measured in millionths of an amp, which never contracts a muscle.

Ya-Man is not in that group, because the Medi Lift PLUS runs milliamp-level EMS, and its FDA filing under K220198 publishes the figures in full.

Maximum output is stated as 3.22 mA at 500 ohms, with pulse widths from 52 to 192 microseconds, frequencies from 2.5 Hz to 1 kHz, and a symmetric biphasic and quadphasic rectangular waveform.

Its own predicate comparison in that filing lists a microcurrent device at 0 to 43.2 microamps, which shows how far apart the two categories sit.

So this is a comparison between two devices doing the same job, which makes it more useful than most, and it means the differences are about delivery rather than about whether anything happens at all.

The output figures, side by side

Medi Lift PLUS publishes 3.22 mA at 500 ohms.

PureLift Face publishes 7 mA at 500 ohms, Pro Edition 7.7 mA, and Pro Plus and GLOW 9 mA, all at the same load.

Comparing at a stated load is the only fair way to do it, and it is worth noting that Ya-Man is one of the few brands in this category where that comparison is even possible.

Higher output is not automatically better, because comfort and control decide whether you keep using a device, which is why PureLift runs PDM underneath the current across 361 frequency points rather than holding one fixed frequency.

What the figures do establish is that both devices are operating above the motor threshold, which almost nothing else in the consumer market is.

Where Ya-Man publishes, and where it does not

Ya-Man's own consumer pages publish no output figure at all, listing rated power and little else.

Everything quoted above comes from the company's FDA submission, which is public, and which most buyers will never think to look up.

We would rather the figures were on the product page, and we say the same about ourselves, which is why ours are.

Credit where it is due: the filing is thorough, the numbers are specific, and a brand willing to put 3.22 mA at 500 ohms in writing to a regulator is not hiding.

Six fixed electrodes, and what they reach

The Medi Lift PLUS is a silicone mask worn on the lower face, with two controllers carrying six electrodes of about 5 square centimetres each.

Ya-Man's FDA filing states the intended anatomical position plainly as the cheeks, and the company sells a separate eye mask, which is a fair acknowledgement that the face mask does not cover the eye area.

That gives roughly 30 square centimetres of fixed contact, over the cheeks, with the forehead, the periorbital area and much of the jawline receiving nothing.

A probe you move works differently, because you place the current where the muscle you want is, follow it along its length, and spend longer where the face has dropped most.

The trade is real in both directions: the mask asks nothing of your technique, and the probe asks you to learn where things are and rewards you for it.

What hands-free actually buys you

Ten minutes of hands-free treatment is easier to keep as a habit than ten minutes of holding a probe, and the treatment you actually do beats the one you skip.

If your honest assessment of yourself is that you will not stand at a mirror four times a week, a mask that works while you answer email is the better purchase, and we would rather say that than pretend otherwise.

The counterweight is that the PLUS has one mode, a fixed ten-minute timer the user cannot change, and a five-hour minimum between sessions.

PureLift gives you ten levels, Lift and Infuse modes, and the choice to spend your three minutes a side where your face needs it.

Buying one in the United States

Ya-Man sells a Medi Lift range in the US, and the PLUS is not in it, so American buyers are going through importers at prices Ya-Man does not set.

The Japanese price is ¥33,000, which is roughly $220 at recent rates, though that is a currency conversion rather than a US price.

Be careful not to buy a different device by mistake, because the US Medi Lift range and the PLUS are separate products with separate FDA clearances and different level structures.

The mask is made in China with the controller made in Japan, which Ya-Man states on its own specification.

What PureLift carries that the PLUS does not

The PLUS is EMS and only EMS, with no microcurrent band, no nanocurrent band, no light and no serum delivery mode.

PureLift Face at $499 carries six technologies on one dial: Infusion, iontophoresis, nanocurrent at level 1, microcurrent at level 2, EMS from level 3 and PDM underneath all of it.

The Infuse pass runs afterwards with any water-based serum, which the PLUS has no equivalent of, and there is no branded gel requirement on either device.

On the science, Kavanagh and colleagues measured an 18.6 percent increase in cheek muscle thickness over twelve weeks of motor-level stimulation (10.1111/jocd.12007), which is the mechanism both devices are working through.

Which one to buy

Buy the Medi Lift PLUS if hands-free is the thing that will get you to use it, if the cheeks are your only concern, and if importing from Japan does not put you off.

Buy PureLift Face if you want the whole face treated including the brow and jawline, the calm levels and the muscle levels on one dial, the serum pass afterwards, and a higher published output at the same stated load.

Step up to Pro Plus at $899 if you want 9 mA and PDM++, or GLOW at $999 if light matters alongside the muscle work.

This comparison sits inside our full map of the category, where we set out all 33 devices we track, what each one carries and what each brand publishes: Nine Technologies on One Dial, What the Rest of the Market Actually Carries.

Specifications verified on 17 September 2026 against Ya-Man's published material and its FDA 510(k) summary K220198.

Regresar al blog