What We Would Tell You Not to Buy, Including From Us
Medically reviewed by
4 independent reviewers
Andrew Conrad Barile, Fisioterapeuta, Doctor en Terapia Física
Doctorado en Terapia Física (DPT), Fisioterapeuta Licenciado (PT)
Read bio
El Dr. Andrew Conrad Barile es Doctor en Terapia Física y CEO y Fundador de Xtreem Pulse LLC. Obtuvo su Doctorado en Terapia Física en Daemen College y aporta más de dos décadas de experiencia clínica y empresarial en terapia física pediátrica, terapia craneosacral e innovación en dispositivos médicos. Su profundo conocimiento de la anatomía humana, la fisiología muscular y la tecnología terapéutica ofrece un enfoque invaluable respaldado por la ciencia para la rejuvenecimiento facial y soluciones antienvejecimiento.
Bertica M. Rubio, M.D.
Director Médico, Clínica de Medicina Regenerativa y Antienvejecimiento | Médico Certificado por la Junta | Escuela de Medicina de Dartmouth
Read bio
La Dra. Bertica M. Rubio es una médica certificada y Directora Médica de la Clínica de Medicina Regenerativa y Antienvejecimiento en Redlands, California. Obtuvo su licenciatura en Ciencias en la Universidad Loyola Marymount y su título de Doctora en Medicina en la Escuela de Medicina de Dartmouth (Geisel School of Medicine). Completó su residencia en pediatría en el Centro Médico UC Irvine.
Con décadas de experiencia clínica, la Dra. Rubio se especializa en medicina para el manejo de la edad, medicina regenerativa, cicatrización de heridas y terapias con factores de crecimiento. Su práctica integra la ciencia médica basada en evidencia con tratamientos estéticos y regenerativos avanzados, ayudando a los pacientes a alcanzar una salud óptima y vitalidad juvenil.
La Dra. Rubio siente pasión por educar a los pacientes sobre la ciencia detrás del cuidado de la piel, el rejuvenecimiento facial y las tecnologías no invasivas como EMS (Estimulación Eléctrica Muscular) para el tonificado facial. Sus artículos para PureLift LAB combinan un conocimiento médico riguroso con orientación práctica para lograr resultados reales y duraderos.
Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS
Otorrinolaringólogo y cirujano de cabeza y cuello certificado | Miembro, Colegio Americano de Cirujanos | Profesor clínico asistente, Escuela de Medicina Mount Sinai
Read bio
Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS, es un otorrinolaringólogo certificado por la junta y cirujano de cabeza y cuello en ENT and Allergy Associates en West Nyack, NY. Obtuvo su título de médico en la Facultad de Médicos y Cirujanos de la Universidad de Columbia, completó su residencia en Otorrinolaringología en el Centro Médico de la Universidad de Nueva York y es profesor clínico asistente en la Escuela de Medicina Mount Sinai. Es miembro de la American College of Surgeons y de la American Academy of Otolaryngology.
La perspectiva quirúrgica de cabeza y cuello del Dr. Grinberg ofrece a los lectores de PureLift LAB una visión clínica más amplia, conectando la práctica de EMS en casa con la anatomía médica subyacente con el mismo rigor científico que aplicamos a cada especificación del dispositivo.
Prof. Dr. med. Ivo Buschmann
Cátedra de Angiología, Hochschule Médica de Brandeburgo | Director de Clínica, Clínica Universitaria de Angiología, Hospital Universitario de Brandeburgo | Ex Consultor Senior, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlín
Read bio
El Prof. Dr. med. Ivo Buschmann es Catedrático de Angiología en la Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane (MHB) y Director Clínico de la Clínica Universitaria de Angiología en el Hospital Universitario de Brandeburgo. Completó su formación médica en la Universidad de Hamburgo, fue becario de la Sociedad Max-Planck en el Instituto Max-Planck de Investigación Cardiaca y Pulmonar, y ocupó cargos de consultor senior en la Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Virchow antes de ser nombrado Catedrático en la MHB en 2016.
El Prof. Buschmann es una de las principales autoridades europeas en arteriogénesis — el crecimiento y remodelación de los vasos sanguíneos impulsados por el flujo — con más de 150 publicaciones revisadas por pares y varias patentes en EE. UU. y la UE sobre dispositivos que estimulan el crecimiento de vasos colaterales mediante terapia controlada de tasa de cizalladura. Su investigación conecta la estimulación mecánica y eléctrica con la adaptación vascular, la microcirculación y la perfusión tisular.
Las contribuciones del Prof. Buschmann aportan a los lectores de PureLift LAB una perspectiva de biología vascular que complementa nuestra autoría clínica, de fisioterapia y de anatomía quirúrgica existente — explicando cómo la estimulación EMS activa no solo los músculos faciales sino también la microcirculación que los abastece, y por qué la administración inteligente es tan importante a nivel del flujo sanguíneo como en la contracción muscular.
Compartir
There are four situations where buying a PureLift is a mistake, and in three whole categories a competitor will serve you better than we will.
This article covers what actually decides the answer, such as:
- the concerns a muscle device genuinely cannot address
- the three categories where a competitor beats us
- the model in our range most people should skip
- when the honest advice is to buy nothing at all
- how to tell which problem you actually have
and many more!
A brand that has never told you not to buy something has not told you much.
Key Points:
If your concern is skin texture and fine lines rather than facial contour, an LED mask or an RF device addresses it more directly than we do.
If you want percussion massage for jaw tension, Therabody does that and we do not.
If you want the largest possible light dose across the whole face, a well-specified mask beats GLOW's light layer by a wide margin and costs a third as much.
If you will not use a device three times a week for twelve weeks, no device in this category will do anything for you, including ours.
Within our range, most people buying Pro Plus or GLOW for the output figure alone would be better served by Face or Pro.
If the problem is the surface, not the shape
Pinch the skin on your cheek gently. If it feels thin and crepey and settles slowly, that is a dermal problem.
Radiofrequency heats the dermis to provoke a collagen response over weeks, and light therapy works on skin cells, and both address texture more directly than muscle work does.
We do not make an RF device and have no plans to, so if a clinician has told you heat-driven remodelling is what you need, buy one.
NEWA publishes its frequency, wattage and thermal cutoff in its regulatory record, which makes it the most checkable option in that category.
If you want light, buy light
GLOW publishes 1.13 W/m2 and 678 J/m2 over ten minutes, which converts to 0.113 mW/cm2 and 0.068 J/cm2.
HigherDOSE publishes 50 mW/cm2 and files 30 J/cm2; Shark files 128 mW/cm2 and doses up to 431 J/cm2; Omnilux publishes about 30 mW/cm2.
There is no version of that arithmetic where our light layer delivers more, and a mask covers the whole face at once while a probe does not.
Buy a mask if light is the purchase, and buy GLOW only if you want the muscle work with light alongside it.
If you want percussion, or an app
Therabody's TheraFace PRO does percussion massage and we do not, so for jaw tension specifically it is the better tool.
Some people genuinely want a guided app that scores their consistency and walks them through a routine, and ZIIP and NuFACE do that well.
Our devices have no app at all, which we consider a feature and some buyers will consider a gap, and both readings are reasonable.
There is no point pretending a preference is a defect just because it is not ours.
If you will not keep it up
Every result in this category comes from repeated sessions over three months, and the research protocols look like that because nothing shorter shows change.
If you already know from experience that a four-times-a-week routine will not survive your February, the honest answer is to buy nothing and spend the money on sun protection and sleep, which do more for a face than most devices.
That is not false modesty. A device used twice and shelved is worse value than no device at all.
If you are unsure, buy at the bottom of a range rather than the top, from anyone, and find out cheaply.
What not to buy in our own range
Pro Plus at $899 and GLOW at $999 publish 9 mA against 7 mA on Face, and people frequently buy up for that figure alone.
Higher output is not automatically better, since comfort decides whether you keep using a device and everything above your working level goes unused.
Buy Pro Plus for PDM++ and the diamond-faceted probe if you want them, and buy GLOW if you specifically want light in the same session; do not buy either for the milliamps.
Most people are well served by Face at $499, and Pro at $699 or Pro Edition at $799 if the slim professional pen format suits your hand better.
That advice costs us money on every customer who takes it, which is the only reason it is worth printing.
Working out which problem you have
Look at the line from cheekbone to chin in a mirror, and compare it with a photograph of yourself from five or ten years ago.
If the shape has changed, that is contour, and contour sits on muscle, which is our argument and the only one we make.
If the surface has changed while the shape has held, that is skin, and light or RF is the more direct answer.
Most people over forty have some of both, in which case devices stack rather than compete, and we have written about how to run them together.
This comparison sits inside our full map of the category, where we set out all 33 devices we track, what each one carries and what each brand publishes: Nine Technologies on One Dial, What the Rest of the Market Actually Carries.
Positions and figures checked on 21 September 2026 against each brand's own published material and the FDA 510(k) database.