Are Microcurrent Devices Worth It, an Honest Cost Benefit
Medically reviewed by
4 independent reviewers
Andrew Conrad Barile, kinésithérapeute, DPT
Doctorat en physiothérapie (DPT), physiothérapeute agréé (PT)
Read bio
Le Dr Andrew Conrad Barile est docteur en physiothérapie et PDG ainsi que fondateur de Xtreem Pulse LLC. Il a obtenu son doctorat en physiothérapie à Daemen College et possède plus de vingt ans d'expérience clinique et entrepreneuriale en physiothérapie pédiatrique, thérapie craniosacrale et innovation en dispositifs médicaux. Sa profonde connaissance de l'anatomie humaine, de la physiologie musculaire et des technologies thérapeutiques offre une approche scientifique précieuse pour le rajeunissement du visage et les solutions anti-âge.
Bertica M. Rubio, M.D.
Directeur Médical, Clinique de Médecine Régénérative Anti-âge | Médecin Certifié par le Conseil | École de Médecine de Dartmouth
Read bio
Le Dr Bertica M. Rubio est une médecin certifiée et directrice médicale de la clinique de médecine régénérative anti-âge à Redlands, en Californie. Elle a obtenu son Bachelor of Science à l'Université Loyola Marymount et son Doctorat en médecine à la Dartmouth Medical School (Geisel School of Medicine). Elle a effectué sa résidence en pédiatrie au UC Irvine Medical Center.
Forte de plusieurs décennies d'expérience clinique, le Dr Rubio est spécialisée en médecine de gestion du vieillissement, médecine régénérative, cicatrisation des plaies et thérapies par facteurs de croissance. Sa pratique intègre la science médicale fondée sur des preuves avec des traitements esthétiques et régénératifs avancés, aidant les patients à atteindre une santé optimale et une vitalité juvénile.
Le Dr Rubio est passionnée par l'éducation des patients sur la science derrière les soins de la peau, le rajeunissement du visage et les technologies non invasives comme l'EMS (stimulation électrique musculaire) pour le tonus facial. Ses articles pour PureLift LAB allient connaissances médicales rigoureuses et conseils pratiques pour obtenir des résultats réels et durables.
Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS
Otolaryngologiste et chirurgien de la tête et du cou certifié par le conseil | Membre, American College of Surgeons | Professeur clinique adjoint, Mount Sinai School of Medicine
Read bio
Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS, est un oto-rhino-laryngologiste certifié par le conseil et chirurgien de la tête et du cou chez ENT and Allergy Associates à West Nyack, NY. Il a obtenu son diplôme de médecine au Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, a effectué sa résidence en oto-rhino-laryngologie au New York University Medical Center, et est professeur clinique adjoint à la Mount Sinai School of Medicine. Il est membre de l'American College of Surgeons et de l'American Academy of Otolaryngology.
La perspective chirurgicale de la tête et du cou du Dr Grinberg offre aux lecteurs de PureLift LAB une vision clinique élargie — reliant la pratique EMS à domicile à l'anatomie médicale sous-jacente avec la même rigueur scientifique que celle que nous appliquons à chaque spécification d'appareil.
Prof. Dr med Ivo Buschmann
Président d'Angiologie, Hochschule Medizinische Brandenburg | Directeur de clinique, Clinique universitaire d'angiologie, Hôpital universitaire de Brandebourg | Ancien consultant principal, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Read bio
Le Prof. Dr. med. Ivo Buschmann est titulaire de la chaire d'angiologie à la Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane (MHB) et directeur de la clinique universitaire d'angiologie à l'hôpital universitaire de Brandebourg. Il a effectué sa formation médicale à l'Université de Hambourg, a été boursier de la Société Max-Planck à l'Institut Max-Planck de recherche sur le cœur et les poumons, et a occupé des postes de consultant principal à la Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Virchow avant d'être nommé titulaire de la chaire à la MHB en 2016.
Le Prof. Buschmann est l'une des principales autorités européennes en arteriogenèse — la croissance et le remodelage des vaisseaux sanguins induits par le flux — avec plus de 150 publications évaluées par des pairs et plusieurs brevets américains et européens sur des dispositifs stimulant la croissance des vaisseaux collatéraux par une thérapie contrôlée du taux de cisaillement. Ses recherches relient la stimulation mécanique et électrique à l'adaptation vasculaire, à la microcirculation et à la perfusion tissulaire.
Les contributions du Prof. Buschmann apportent aux lecteurs de PureLift LAB une perspective en biologie vasculaire qui complète notre expertise clinique, en physiothérapie et en anatomie chirurgicale — expliquant comment la stimulation EMS engage non seulement les muscles faciaux mais aussi la microcirculation qui les alimente, et pourquoi une administration intelligente est aussi importante au niveau du flux sanguin qu'à celui de la contraction musculaire.
Partager
A device is worth it if you will use it four times a week for three months and your goal is muscle tone; it is not worth it if you want tighter skin, fewer eye bags or a replacement for a retinoid.
This article sets out what to check before you start, such as:
- the actual cost per session across three years
- what the evidence supports and at what size
- where our own expensive devices are the wrong buy
- what the cheaper alternatives genuinely do
- the four situations where you should buy nothing
and many more!
We would rather you bought the $499 device and used it than the $999 device and left it in a drawer.
Key Points:
At four sessions a week over three years, a $499 device costs about 80 cents a session and a $999 device about $1.60.
The strongest facial stimulation evidence is for muscle thickness, reported as 18.6 percent at the cheek over twelve weeks; the skin-appearance evidence is weaker and the collagen evidence is indirect.
If you are buying on the milliamp figure alone, buy Face or Pro; the step up to 9 mA matters for specific features, not for general results.
Nothing in this category tightens skin by heating tissue, removes submental fat, or does what a retinoid does.
Buy nothing if you will not use it four times a week, if your goal is skin texture rather than tone, if money is tight, or if you have not yet tried sunscreen and a retinoid.
The arithmetic
Our range runs from Face at $499 to GLOW at $999, with Pro at $699, Pro Edition at $799 and Pro Plus at $899.
At four ten-minute sessions a week, three years of use is about 625 sessions, which puts Face at roughly 80 cents a session and GLOW at about $1.60.
Against a professional treatment at $100 to $250 a visit, the device wins on cost per session by a wide margin, provided you actually use it.
Against nothing at all, the device costs whatever you paid, and the drawer rate in this category is the number nobody publishes.
What the evidence actually supports
Kavanagh and colleagues in 2012 followed 108 women over twelve weeks and reported an 18.6 percent increase in cheek muscle thickness measured by ultrasound, which is the strongest result in this literature and is a muscle measurement at the cheek rather than a jawline measurement.
The skin-appearance evidence from split-face and sham-controlled trials shows smaller changes in elasticity and wrinkle measures.
The collagen evidence is indirect, as we set out in our article on collagen, and the facial fat question has never been measured at all.
So the honest claim is muscle tone first, skin appearance second, and everything beyond that unproven.
Where our expensive devices are the wrong buy
If your reason for considering Pro Plus or GLOW is the higher milliamp figure, buy Face or Pro instead, because 7 mA at 500 ohms already sits above the motor threshold for facial muscle and the extra 2 mA is not what produces the result.
Pro Plus at $899 earns its price on PDM++ and the diamond-faceted probe rather than on the current, and if those two features mean nothing to you then neither does the premium.
GLOW at $999 earns its price on the LED channels, red at 634 nm and blue at 465 nm with published figures of 1.13 W/m² and 678 J/m² over ten minutes, and if you do not want LED you are paying for hardware you will not turn on.
Said plainly: most people reading this page should buy Face or Pro, and we are the ones telling you that.
The cheaper alternatives, honestly
A gua sha stone at around $12 produces most of the same-day depuffing, because pressure and direction are what move fluid.
A retinoid does more for skin texture and for dermal collagen than any device in this category, with decades of human biopsy evidence behind it.
Daily sunscreen prevents more visible ageing than anything on this page will reverse, and it costs a few pounds a month.
If you have not got those three in place, a device is the wrong next purchase and we would rather say so than take the order.
Who should buy one
You are in your late thirties or older, your main concern is a softening jawline and loss of definition rather than texture, and you can commit to four sessions a week for three months.
You have the sunscreen and retinoid basics already handled, so the device is an addition rather than a substitute.
You want to consolidate several technologies into one tool rather than buying a separate LED mask, a separate microcurrent device and a separate infusion tool.
You are prepared to be patient, because nothing visible happens in the first fortnight and the twelve week mark is where the trials found their results.
Who should not
Anyone who will not use it four times a week, because an unused device at any price is the worst purchase on this page.
Anyone whose main goal is tighter skin, since that requires heating tissue and we do not heat tissue; radiofrequency is the category and we do not make one, as we say in our comparison.
Anyone looking to reduce submental fat, which no device in this category does.
Anyone for whom $499 is a stretch, because this is a discretionary purchase with a modest effect size and no device is worth financial strain.
This article sits inside our full map of the category, where we set out all 33 devices we track, what each one carries and what each brand publishes: Nine Technologies on One Dial, What the Rest of the Market Actually Carries.