Microcurrent for Jowls, What Actually Moves Them

Medically reviewed by

4 independent reviewers

Andrew Conrad Barile, kinésithérapeute, DPT

Andrew Conrad Barile, kinésithérapeute, DPT

Doctorat en physiothérapie (DPT), physiothérapeute agréé (PT)

Read bio

Le Dr Andrew Conrad Barile est docteur en physiothérapie et PDG ainsi que fondateur de Xtreem Pulse LLC. Il a obtenu son doctorat en physiothérapie à Daemen College et possède plus de vingt ans d'expérience clinique et entrepreneuriale en physiothérapie pédiatrique, thérapie craniosacrale et innovation en dispositifs médicaux. Sa profonde connaissance de l'anatomie humaine, de la physiologie musculaire et des technologies thérapeutiques offre une approche scientifique précieuse pour le rajeunissement du visage et les solutions anti-âge.

Bertica M. Rubio, M.D.

Bertica M. Rubio, M.D.

Directeur Médical, Clinique de Médecine Régénérative Anti-âge | Médecin Certifié par le Conseil | École de Médecine de Dartmouth

Read bio

Le Dr Bertica M. Rubio est une médecin certifiée et directrice médicale de la clinique de médecine régénérative anti-âge à Redlands, en Californie. Elle a obtenu son Bachelor of Science à l'Université Loyola Marymount et son Doctorat en médecine à la Dartmouth Medical School (Geisel School of Medicine). Elle a effectué sa résidence en pédiatrie au UC Irvine Medical Center.

Forte de plusieurs décennies d'expérience clinique, le Dr Rubio est spécialisée en médecine de gestion du vieillissement, médecine régénérative, cicatrisation des plaies et thérapies par facteurs de croissance. Sa pratique intègre la science médicale fondée sur des preuves avec des traitements esthétiques et régénératifs avancés, aidant les patients à atteindre une santé optimale et une vitalité juvénile.

Le Dr Rubio est passionnée par l'éducation des patients sur la science derrière les soins de la peau, le rajeunissement du visage et les technologies non invasives comme l'EMS (stimulation électrique musculaire) pour le tonus facial. Ses articles pour PureLift LAB allient connaissances médicales rigoureuses et conseils pratiques pour obtenir des résultats réels et durables.

Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS

Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS

Otolaryngologiste et chirurgien de la tête et du cou certifié par le conseil | Membre, American College of Surgeons | Professeur clinique adjoint, Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Read bio

Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS, est un oto-rhino-laryngologiste certifié par le conseil et chirurgien de la tête et du cou chez ENT and Allergy Associates à West Nyack, NY. Il a obtenu son diplôme de médecine au Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, a effectué sa résidence en oto-rhino-laryngologie au New York University Medical Center, et est professeur clinique adjoint à la Mount Sinai School of Medicine. Il est membre de l'American College of Surgeons et de l'American Academy of Otolaryngology.

La perspective chirurgicale de la tête et du cou du Dr Grinberg offre aux lecteurs de PureLift LAB une vision clinique élargie — reliant la pratique EMS à domicile à l'anatomie médicale sous-jacente avec la même rigueur scientifique que celle que nous appliquons à chaque spécification d'appareil.

Prof. Dr med Ivo Buschmann

Prof. Dr med Ivo Buschmann

Président d'Angiologie, Hochschule Medizinische Brandenburg | Directeur de clinique, Clinique universitaire d'angiologie, Hôpital universitaire de Brandebourg | Ancien consultant principal, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin

Read bio

Le Prof. Dr. med. Ivo Buschmann est titulaire de la chaire d'angiologie à la Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane (MHB) et directeur de la clinique universitaire d'angiologie à l'hôpital universitaire de Brandebourg. Il a effectué sa formation médicale à l'Université de Hambourg, a été boursier de la Société Max-Planck à l'Institut Max-Planck de recherche sur le cœur et les poumons, et a occupé des postes de consultant principal à la Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Virchow avant d'être nommé titulaire de la chaire à la MHB en 2016.

Le Prof. Buschmann est l'une des principales autorités européennes en arteriogenèse — la croissance et le remodelage des vaisseaux sanguins induits par le flux — avec plus de 150 publications évaluées par des pairs et plusieurs brevets américains et européens sur des dispositifs stimulant la croissance des vaisseaux collatéraux par une thérapie contrôlée du taux de cisaillement. Ses recherches relient la stimulation mécanique et électrique à l'adaptation vasculaire, à la microcirculation et à la perfusion tissulaire.

Les contributions du Prof. Buschmann apportent aux lecteurs de PureLift LAB une perspective en biologie vasculaire qui complète notre expertise clinique, en physiothérapie et en anatomie chirurgicale — expliquant comment la stimulation EMS engage non seulement les muscles faciaux mais aussi la microcirculation qui les alimente, et pourquoi une administration intelligente est aussi importante au niveau du flux sanguin qu'à celui de la contraction musculaire.

What's This About:

Jowls form from a combination of descending fat, loosening retaining ligaments and thinning skin, and a current-based device reaches the muscle contribution only.

This article covers what actually decides the answer, such as:

- what a jowl is actually made of

- which part of it responds to stimulation and which does not

- why early jowls respond better than established ones

- what twelve weeks of honest work can and cannot deliver

- the point at which a surgeon is the right answer

and many more!

This is the article in the set where we have the least to promise, and it is written that way.

Key Points:

A jowl is mostly descended fat and lax retaining ligaments, with muscle tone and skin quality contributing.

Electrical stimulation reaches the muscle contribution and nothing else, which is a minority of what you are looking at.

Early softening along the jaw responds considerably better than an established jowl.

Nothing at home lifts a fat pad back up the face, and any brand suggesting otherwise is overselling.

A well-formed jowl is a surgical or procedural question, and we would rather say so than take the sale.

What you are actually looking at

The jowl is the pad of soft tissue that hangs just forward of the jaw angle, and it forms as facial fat compartments lose volume high in the cheek and descend, meeting the restriction of the retaining ligaments along the jaw.

Three separate things contribute. Fat that used to sit high has moved downward. The ligaments that tether soft tissue to bone have loosened. And the skin has lost some of the recoil that used to hold everything against the frame.

Muscle tone contributes too, particularly through the platysma and the depressor muscles at the corner of the mouth, and it is the smallest of the four contributions in most faces.

That proportion is the whole problem, because muscle is the only one of the four that electrical stimulation touches.

What stimulation actually reaches

Ward and colleagues described the thresholds separating sub-sensory, sensory and motor current, and above the motor threshold a muscle shortens and, with repetition, adapts.

Kavanagh and colleagues measured an 18.6 percent increase in cheek muscle thickness in 108 women over twelve weeks at that level, and the measurement was taken at the cheek rather than along the jaw.

A better-conditioned platysma and a better-conditioned mid-face can improve how the jaw reads, because more supported tissue above the jawline means less spilling over it.

What stimulation cannot do is move a fat pad back up the face or retighten a ligament. No current at any amperage does either, ours included.

Why early jowls respond better

Softening along the jaw that comes and goes with sleep and fluid is largely positional, and that responds quickly to almost anything that moves fluid, including a single session.

Early jowling, where the line is still mostly intact and the shadow appears only in certain light, has a meaningful muscle contribution and often improves noticeably over twelve weeks.

An established jowl, visible from straight on in any light and unchanged when you lie down, is dominated by fat and ligament, and twelve weeks of work will change it very little.

The lying-down test is the most useful thing in this article. If the jaw looks substantially better flat on your back, the soft tissue is still mobile. If it looks much the same, gravity is not the main factor.

What twelve weeks honestly delivers

On an early jowl, a cleaner line from the chin to the jaw angle, a shadow that appears in fewer lighting conditions, and a face that photographs better from three-quarter angles.

On an established jowl, some improvement in the tissue above it and very little in the jowl itself.

In both cases, a same-day fluid effect after each session that flatters the area temporarily and should not be mistaken for the durable change.

If you want to judge it properly, photograph from slightly below the chin at week zero and week twelve under identical light, which is the least flattering angle and therefore the only honest one.

Working the area properly

Run the pass under the jawbone from near the chin outward to the angle below the ear, following the platysma rather than sweeping across it.

Spend more of your three minutes here than anywhere else, because this is where your complaint is.

Work the mid-face as well, even though the jowl is lower, since supporting the tissue above the jaw does more for the line than working the jowl itself.

Our diagram article sets out the directions, and the muscle chart explains which muscle each pass follows.

When to stop reading device articles

If the jowl is well established, if it is visible from straight on in flat light, and if lying down does not change it, the honest options are surgical or procedural rather than electrical.

A deep plane facelift addresses ligaments and fat position, which is precisely what a device cannot. Radiofrequency and ultrasound-based treatments address skin quality and some laxity.

Injectable and thread options exist with their own trade-offs, and a consultation with someone who does not sell devices is worth more than any article, including this one.

We publish this because a brand that tells everyone its device is the answer is easy to catch out, and because the person with an established jowl who buys a device on that promise is the customer we most deserve to lose.

This article sits inside our full map of the category, where we set out all 33 devices we track, what each one carries and what each brand publishes: Nine Technologies on One Dial, What the Rest of the Market Actually Carries.

Retour au blog