Facial Devices and Injectables, Ask Your Injector First
Medically reviewed by
4 independent reviewers
Andrew Conrad Barile, kinésithérapeute, DPT
Doctorat en physiothérapie (DPT), physiothérapeute agréé (PT)
Read bio
Le Dr Andrew Conrad Barile est docteur en physiothérapie et PDG ainsi que fondateur de Xtreem Pulse LLC. Il a obtenu son doctorat en physiothérapie à Daemen College et possède plus de vingt ans d'expérience clinique et entrepreneuriale en physiothérapie pédiatrique, thérapie craniosacrale et innovation en dispositifs médicaux. Sa profonde connaissance de l'anatomie humaine, de la physiologie musculaire et des technologies thérapeutiques offre une approche scientifique précieuse pour le rajeunissement du visage et les solutions anti-âge.
Bertica M. Rubio, M.D.
Directeur Médical, Clinique de Médecine Régénérative Anti-âge | Médecin Certifié par le Conseil | École de Médecine de Dartmouth
Read bio
Le Dr Bertica M. Rubio est une médecin certifiée et directrice médicale de la clinique de médecine régénérative anti-âge à Redlands, en Californie. Elle a obtenu son Bachelor of Science à l'Université Loyola Marymount et son Doctorat en médecine à la Dartmouth Medical School (Geisel School of Medicine). Elle a effectué sa résidence en pédiatrie au UC Irvine Medical Center.
Forte de plusieurs décennies d'expérience clinique, le Dr Rubio est spécialisée en médecine de gestion du vieillissement, médecine régénérative, cicatrisation des plaies et thérapies par facteurs de croissance. Sa pratique intègre la science médicale fondée sur des preuves avec des traitements esthétiques et régénératifs avancés, aidant les patients à atteindre une santé optimale et une vitalité juvénile.
Le Dr Rubio est passionnée par l'éducation des patients sur la science derrière les soins de la peau, le rajeunissement du visage et les technologies non invasives comme l'EMS (stimulation électrique musculaire) pour le tonus facial. Ses articles pour PureLift LAB allient connaissances médicales rigoureuses et conseils pratiques pour obtenir des résultats réels et durables.
Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS
Otolaryngologiste et chirurgien de la tête et du cou certifié par le conseil | Membre, American College of Surgeons | Professeur clinique adjoint, Mount Sinai School of Medicine
Read bio
Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS, est un oto-rhino-laryngologiste certifié par le conseil et chirurgien de la tête et du cou chez ENT and Allergy Associates à West Nyack, NY. Il a obtenu son diplôme de médecine au Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, a effectué sa résidence en oto-rhino-laryngologie au New York University Medical Center, et est professeur clinique adjoint à la Mount Sinai School of Medicine. Il est membre de l'American College of Surgeons et de l'American Academy of Otolaryngology.
La perspective chirurgicale de la tête et du cou du Dr Grinberg offre aux lecteurs de PureLift LAB une vision clinique élargie — reliant la pratique EMS à domicile à l'anatomie médicale sous-jacente avec la même rigueur scientifique que celle que nous appliquons à chaque spécification d'appareil.
Prof. Dr med Ivo Buschmann
Président d'Angiologie, Hochschule Medizinische Brandenburg | Directeur de clinique, Clinique universitaire d'angiologie, Hôpital universitaire de Brandebourg | Ancien consultant principal, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Read bio
Le Prof. Dr. med. Ivo Buschmann est titulaire de la chaire d'angiologie à la Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane (MHB) et directeur de la clinique universitaire d'angiologie à l'hôpital universitaire de Brandebourg. Il a effectué sa formation médicale à l'Université de Hambourg, a été boursier de la Société Max-Planck à l'Institut Max-Planck de recherche sur le cœur et les poumons, et a occupé des postes de consultant principal à la Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Virchow avant d'être nommé titulaire de la chaire à la MHB en 2016.
Le Prof. Buschmann est l'une des principales autorités européennes en arteriogenèse — la croissance et le remodelage des vaisseaux sanguins induits par le flux — avec plus de 150 publications évaluées par des pairs et plusieurs brevets américains et européens sur des dispositifs stimulant la croissance des vaisseaux collatéraux par une thérapie contrôlée du taux de cisaillement. Ses recherches relient la stimulation mécanique et électrique à l'adaptation vasculaire, à la microcirculation et à la perfusion tissulaire.
Les contributions du Prof. Buschmann apportent aux lecteurs de PureLift LAB une perspective en biologie vasculaire qui complète notre expertise clinique, en physiothérapie et en anatomie chirurgicale — expliquant comment la stimulation EMS engage non seulement les muscles faciaux mais aussi la microcirculation qui les alimente, et pourquoi une administration intelligente est aussi importante au niveau du flux sanguin qu'à celui de la contraction musculaire.
Partager
A neuromodulator relaxes a muscle and EMS contracts one, which is a real reason to think carefully about combining them.
This article sets out what to check before you start, such as:
- Why the question is a real one
- What is actually known
- Why your injector is the right person to ask
- Treated areas and untreated areas
- If you cannot reach them
and many more!
The person who performed your treatment knows what was injected, where, and how much, and that is who decides.
Key Points:
Ask your injector before your next appointment rather than afterwards, so the answer arrives before the question is urgent.
Injectors routinely give aftercare instructions about pressure and massage; those instructions govern.
The treated area and the untreated areas are separate questions.
Nothing here is medical advice and none of it overrides what your clinician tells you.
If you cannot reach your injector, waiting is the conservative choice and costs you very little.
Why the question is a real one
A neuromodulator works by preventing a muscle from contracting. EMS works by making a muscle contract. Those are opposing actions on the same tissue, which is enough to make anyone pause before doing both in the same week.
Fillers raise a different question again, since they are placed volume that sits in tissue and settles over days, and pressure applied over a fresh placement is something injectors already have views about.
Both questions are legitimate, and neither has a published answer for facial devices specifically.
What is actually known
The facial stimulation research, Kavanagh and colleagues over 12 weeks (10.1111/jocd.12007) and Chang and colleagues in a sham-controlled design (10.3390/ijerph17113783), studied stimulation on its own. None of it involved injectables.
So there is no interval anyone can quote from evidence, and a page that gives you a confident number of weeks has invented it.
What does exist is the aftercare guidance injectors give routinely, which typically covers pressure, massage, heat and exercise for a period after treatment. That guidance is the relevant instruction, and it is written for what you specifically had done.
Why your injector is the right person to ask
They know the product, the dose, the exact placement and the depth, and those four determine how much any of this matters.
They also know how your treatment has behaved previously, which is information no general article has.
Ask before your next appointment rather than after it, since a question asked in the chair is answered calmly and a question asked at eleven at night with a device in your hand is not.
Bring the specifics: which device, what output, which areas you work, and how often. "A facial EMS device at up to 9 mA, ten minutes, four times a week, jaw and cheek" is a question they can answer; "a beauty gadget" is not.
Treated areas and untreated areas
These are separate questions and worth asking separately.
Your injector may be comfortable with you working an untreated area while asking you to leave a treated one alone, or may prefer you pause entirely for a period. Either answer is reasonable and neither is one we can give you.
If you are told to avoid an area, avoid it rather than working around the edge of it.
If you cannot reach them
Waiting is the conservative option, and the cost of waiting a week or two is close to nothing. Kavanagh's protocol ran twelve weeks, so this is not a routine where a fortnight's pause undoes anything.
Do not split the difference by using the device at a lower level as a compromise, since that is a guess dressed as caution.
Resume once you have an answer, at your usual level, rather than doing extra to make up for the pause. Three minutes per side is the maximum on any PureLift model whatever else is going on.
What we are not going to tell you
We are not going to publish a number of days, because we do not know it and neither does anyone else selling a facial device.
We are not going to suggest that a device enhances, extends or complements an injectable treatment, since no study supports any of those three.
And we are not going to imply that a device is an alternative to an injectable; a neuromodulator relaxes a specific muscle and a filler replaces volume, and no current does either.
For what a device does reach, see the six layers of the face.
This is general information and not medical advice. Questions about your own treatment belong with the clinician who performed it.
Two related questions come up often alongside this one, and we have answered both in full: the timing around botox and fillers, and the full safety picture, including who should not use one.