PureLift Face vs NuFACE Trinity+, $499 vs $395 Compared Honestly

Medically reviewed by

4 independent reviewers

Andrew Conrad Barile, kinésithérapeute, DPT

Andrew Conrad Barile, kinésithérapeute, DPT

Doctorat en physiothérapie (DPT), physiothérapeute agréé (PT)

Read bio

Le Dr Andrew Conrad Barile est docteur en physiothérapie et PDG ainsi que fondateur de Xtreem Pulse LLC. Il a obtenu son doctorat en physiothérapie à Daemen College et possède plus de vingt ans d'expérience clinique et entrepreneuriale en physiothérapie pédiatrique, thérapie craniosacrale et innovation en dispositifs médicaux. Sa profonde connaissance de l'anatomie humaine, de la physiologie musculaire et des technologies thérapeutiques offre une approche scientifique précieuse pour le rajeunissement du visage et les solutions anti-âge.

Bertica M. Rubio, M.D.

Bertica M. Rubio, M.D.

Directeur Médical, Clinique de Médecine Régénérative Anti-âge | Médecin Certifié par le Conseil | École de Médecine de Dartmouth

Read bio

Le Dr Bertica M. Rubio est une médecin certifiée et directrice médicale de la clinique de médecine régénérative anti-âge à Redlands, en Californie. Elle a obtenu son Bachelor of Science à l'Université Loyola Marymount et son Doctorat en médecine à la Dartmouth Medical School (Geisel School of Medicine). Elle a effectué sa résidence en pédiatrie au UC Irvine Medical Center.

Forte de plusieurs décennies d'expérience clinique, le Dr Rubio est spécialisée en médecine de gestion du vieillissement, médecine régénérative, cicatrisation des plaies et thérapies par facteurs de croissance. Sa pratique intègre la science médicale fondée sur des preuves avec des traitements esthétiques et régénératifs avancés, aidant les patients à atteindre une santé optimale et une vitalité juvénile.

Le Dr Rubio est passionnée par l'éducation des patients sur la science derrière les soins de la peau, le rajeunissement du visage et les technologies non invasives comme l'EMS (stimulation électrique musculaire) pour le tonus facial. Ses articles pour PureLift LAB allient connaissances médicales rigoureuses et conseils pratiques pour obtenir des résultats réels et durables.

Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS

Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS

Otolaryngologiste et chirurgien de la tête et du cou certifié par le conseil | Membre, American College of Surgeons | Professeur clinique adjoint, Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Read bio

Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS, est un oto-rhino-laryngologiste certifié par le conseil et chirurgien de la tête et du cou chez ENT and Allergy Associates à West Nyack, NY. Il a obtenu son diplôme de médecine au Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, a effectué sa résidence en oto-rhino-laryngologie au New York University Medical Center, et est professeur clinique adjoint à la Mount Sinai School of Medicine. Il est membre de l'American College of Surgeons et de l'American Academy of Otolaryngology.

La perspective chirurgicale de la tête et du cou du Dr Grinberg offre aux lecteurs de PureLift LAB une vision clinique élargie — reliant la pratique EMS à domicile à l'anatomie médicale sous-jacente avec la même rigueur scientifique que celle que nous appliquons à chaque spécification d'appareil.

Prof. Dr med Ivo Buschmann

Prof. Dr med Ivo Buschmann

Président d'Angiologie, Hochschule Medizinische Brandenburg | Directeur de clinique, Clinique universitaire d'angiologie, Hôpital universitaire de Brandebourg | Ancien consultant principal, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin

Read bio

Le Prof. Dr. med. Ivo Buschmann est titulaire de la chaire d'angiologie à la Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane (MHB) et directeur de la clinique universitaire d'angiologie à l'hôpital universitaire de Brandebourg. Il a effectué sa formation médicale à l'Université de Hambourg, a été boursier de la Société Max-Planck à l'Institut Max-Planck de recherche sur le cœur et les poumons, et a occupé des postes de consultant principal à la Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Virchow avant d'être nommé titulaire de la chaire à la MHB en 2016.

Le Prof. Buschmann est l'une des principales autorités européennes en arteriogenèse — la croissance et le remodelage des vaisseaux sanguins induits par le flux — avec plus de 150 publications évaluées par des pairs et plusieurs brevets américains et européens sur des dispositifs stimulant la croissance des vaisseaux collatéraux par une thérapie contrôlée du taux de cisaillement. Ses recherches relient la stimulation mécanique et électrique à l'adaptation vasculaire, à la microcirculation et à la perfusion tissulaire.

Les contributions du Prof. Buschmann apportent aux lecteurs de PureLift LAB une perspective en biologie vasculaire qui complète notre expertise clinique, en physiothérapie et en anatomie chirurgicale — expliquant comment la stimulation EMS engage non seulement les muscles faciaux mais aussi la microcirculation qui les alimente, et pourquoi une administration intelligente est aussi importante au niveau du flux sanguin qu'à celui de la contraction musculaire.

What's This About:

NuFACE Trinity+ at $395 and PureLift Face at $499 are the closest match in price, and both give you microcurrent, but only one of them keeps going into the muscle underneath.

This article compares the two devices on the things that decide what you see in the mirror, such as:

- What Trinity+ does well, and where its current stops

- Why PureLift Face runs microcurrent too, at level 2 of ten

- What the eight levels above microcurrent are for

- What the Infuse pass does for the serum you already own

- What each device costs to keep using after the box

and many more!

By the end you will know which of the two matches the change you are trying to make.

Key Points:

NuFACE Trinity+ costs $395 and delivers between 170 and 200 microamps, which stays below the level that moves a facial muscle.

PureLift Face costs $499 and delivers up to 7 milliamps, running microcurrent at level 2 and muscle-engaging EMS from level 3 to level 10.

Both devices give you microcurrent; only PureLift also has nanocurrent below it and EMS above it.

Face also has Infuse, a second pass that supports absorption of the serum on your skin, and it works with any water-based serum rather than a gel you must rebuy.

No trial has compared these two devices, so this is about documented capability rather than a head-to-head result.

NuFACE is the name most people meet first, and there is a good reason for that: Trinity+ is a well-made device with a large following and a genuine track record in the microcurrent category.

At $395 for the starter kit it also sits close enough to PureLift Face at $499 for the comparison to be fair, which is why this article puts those two side by side rather than borrowing figures from a $999 flagship.

The question is not whether microcurrent works, because it does; the question is what each device is allowed to do once the current is switched on.

What Trinity+ does, and where it stops

Trinity+ is a microcurrent device, and microcurrent is measured in millionths of an amp.

NuFACE does not publish an output figure on its own website, so the number in this comparison, between 170 and 200 microamps, comes from its FDA clearance summary.

At that scale the current is talking to skin cells rather than to the nerves that drive muscle, and the research behind that territory is real: laboratory work shows defined small currents change how skin cells behave, and small facial studies report improvements in wrinkle scores, dermal density and texture (Saniee 2012).

Pooled randomised trials in wound care covering seven studies and 337 people found that adding microcurrent to standard care helped wounds close faster (Avendano-Coy 2022), which is the strongest clinical support the low-current category has.

What none of that research shows is a muscle moving, because at microamp levels the muscle is not being asked to do anything, and that is the boundary of the category rather than a fault in the device.

PureLift Face has microcurrent too, at level 2

PureLift Face has ten levels on one dial, and the first two cover the territory Trinity+ occupies.

Level 1 is nanocurrent, billionths of an amp, below the level you can feel, which makes it the setting for a reactive day or the thin skin around the eyes, and Trinity+ has no equivalent.

Level 2 is microcurrent, the same gentle skin-level current Trinity+ is built around, so if a microcurrent routine is what you came for, Face already has it.

Levels 3 to 10 are EMS, and that is where the two devices stop being versions of the same thing.

The eight levels above microcurrent

Electrical muscle stimulation delivers enough current to fire the nerve that drives a facial muscle, and you can watch it happen in the mirror.

Around forty small muscles sit under the skin of your face, held inside a connected sheet called the SMAS, and engaging them repeatedly is how EMS supports a firmer, more defined look along the jaw, cheeks and neck.

In the largest facial trial of its kind, 108 women used facial muscle stimulation daily for twelve weeks and ultrasound measured an 18.6 percent increase in cheek-muscle thickness, with a clear difference from the untreated group at six weeks (Kavanagh 2012).

A double-blind trial against a dummy device that looked identical found muscle thickness and bite force increased after six weeks (Chang 2020), which is the strictest test design this field has.

One split-face study makes the division of labour plain, because the microcurrent side improved eye-wrinkle volume and dermal density while the EMS side improved lifting measures, which is two currents doing two different jobs on one face (Kwak 2023).

Those are category studies using their own devices, so they show what facial muscle stimulation can do rather than what PureLift Face did for anyone in particular.

Strength, in context

Trinity+ reaches between 170 and 200 microamps and PureLift Face reaches 7 milliamps, which is 7,000 microamps, so the difference in maximum output is roughly thirty-five times.

That ratio matters less than what it crosses, because the useful boundary is the point where the nerve fires the muscle rather than any particular number.

Output figures are measured at 500 ohms and consumer copy says up to, because the current that actually reaches you depends on contact, placement and your own skin.

What Face adds after the muscle work

Face has a second mode called Infuse, run after the Lift pass with your serum still on, and Trinity+ has no equivalent at any setting.

Infuse is built on the delivery science of electroporation, where brief electrical pulses were shown to open temporary routes through the skin's outer barrier (Prausnitz 1993) and to enhance vitamin C penetration in human skin (Zhang 1999).

On Face it is a gentle second pass that supports absorption of the serum already on your skin, and we say supports absorption and no more, because no product-specific penetration study exists.

So the $499 device carries four technologies on one handheld: nanocurrent, microcurrent, EMS and absorption.

The cost after the box

Both devices need a conductive medium on the skin, so the purchase price is not the whole cost.

NuFACE sells its own activator gels from $35 a bottle and positions the gel as an essential step in the routine.

PureLift works with any water-based serum, including the one already on your shelf, and ships with a bottle of Activator Serum to start, so the running cost stays in your hands.

Trinity+ also has an optional companion app, while Face has ten levels on a dial and nothing to pair.

Where Trinity+ has the edge

NuFACE sells attachment heads for Trinity+, including a red-light attachment, and light is the one thing Face leaves to GLOW further up the range.

If light therapy is a large part of what you are shopping for, that attachment is worth weighing against GLOW at $999, which carries red at 634 nm, blue at 465 nm and purple for both at once on the handpiece itself.

Trinity+ is also the more familiar name, with a longer high-street presence, and that counts for something when you want a device your facialist recognises.

Three minutes on each side

Three minutes on each side of the face, at a level where you can see the muscle answer, and the difference is visible in the mirror: a fresher, more lifted-looking face, because the muscles have worked and blood is flowing.

That first effect is temporary, like the glow after a walk, and it comes back every session, while the lasting change follows the research clock at six and twelve weeks of daily use.

The full PureLift session runs ten minutes and switches itself off, and a Trinity+ session runs five.

Which one to buy

Buy NuFACE Trinity+ if microcurrent is genuinely all you want, if the app and the attachment system appeal, and if the $100 saving matters more to you than the muscle layer.

Buy PureLift Face if you want that same microcurrent routine at level 2, the eight levels above it where the muscles that hold your face up are asked to work, and the Infuse pass for your serum afterwards.

For an extra $100 you are not buying a better microcurrent device, you are buying a device that does microcurrent and then keeps going, which is a different purchase.

If you were looking at the Trinity+ Complete Set at $595 rather than the starter kit, the price-matched PureLift is Pro at $699, the same four technologies at the same 7 milliamps in the slim professional pen the treatment rooms use.

Step up beyond that only if a specific need justifies it: Pro Edition at $799 for more room at the top of the dial, Pro Plus + at $899 for the strongest output in the range at 9 milliamps, or GLOW at $999 if breakouts and fine lines sit alongside the sagging, because GLOW adds red, blue and purple light.

No randomised trial has compared PureLift with NuFACE, so this recommendation rests on what each device is documented to do rather than on a head-to-head result.

PureLift Face is cleared through the FDA 510(k) pathway under record K190269 and made in Japan in an ISO 13485 facility, and clearance is a safety review rather than an endorsement of results.

For the level-by-level sensations, read what a session feels like, and for the full Face write-up, read the PureLift Face review.

Prices and competitor specifications verified on 8 September 2026 against NuFACE's own website and its FDA clearance summary, and the PureLift LAB store. NuFACE does not publish an output figure on its product pages, so the 170 to 200 microamp range comes from its FDA document. PureLift Face output stated as up to 7 mA measured at 500 ohms, FDA record K190269.

This comparison sits inside our full map of the category, where we set out all 33 devices we track, what each one carries and what each brand publishes: Nine Technologies on One Dial, What the Rest of the Market Actually Carries.

Retour au blog