Who Invented Microcurrent, the History of the Microcurrent Facial
Medically reviewed by
4 independent reviewers
Andrew Conrad Barile, kinésithérapeute, DPT
Doctorat en physiothérapie (DPT), physiothérapeute agréé (PT)
Read bio
Le Dr Andrew Conrad Barile est docteur en physiothérapie et PDG ainsi que fondateur de Xtreem Pulse LLC. Il a obtenu son doctorat en physiothérapie à Daemen College et possède plus de vingt ans d'expérience clinique et entrepreneuriale en physiothérapie pédiatrique, thérapie craniosacrale et innovation en dispositifs médicaux. Sa profonde connaissance de l'anatomie humaine, de la physiologie musculaire et des technologies thérapeutiques offre une approche scientifique précieuse pour le rajeunissement du visage et les solutions anti-âge.
Bertica M. Rubio, M.D.
Directeur Médical, Clinique de Médecine Régénérative Anti-âge | Médecin Certifié par le Conseil | École de Médecine de Dartmouth
Read bio
Le Dr Bertica M. Rubio est une médecin certifiée et directrice médicale de la clinique de médecine régénérative anti-âge à Redlands, en Californie. Elle a obtenu son Bachelor of Science à l'Université Loyola Marymount et son Doctorat en médecine à la Dartmouth Medical School (Geisel School of Medicine). Elle a effectué sa résidence en pédiatrie au UC Irvine Medical Center.
Forte de plusieurs décennies d'expérience clinique, le Dr Rubio est spécialisée en médecine de gestion du vieillissement, médecine régénérative, cicatrisation des plaies et thérapies par facteurs de croissance. Sa pratique intègre la science médicale fondée sur des preuves avec des traitements esthétiques et régénératifs avancés, aidant les patients à atteindre une santé optimale et une vitalité juvénile.
Le Dr Rubio est passionnée par l'éducation des patients sur la science derrière les soins de la peau, le rajeunissement du visage et les technologies non invasives comme l'EMS (stimulation électrique musculaire) pour le tonus facial. Ses articles pour PureLift LAB allient connaissances médicales rigoureuses et conseils pratiques pour obtenir des résultats réels et durables.
Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS
Otolaryngologiste et chirurgien de la tête et du cou certifié par le conseil | Membre, American College of Surgeons | Professeur clinique adjoint, Mount Sinai School of Medicine
Read bio
Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS, est un oto-rhino-laryngologiste certifié par le conseil et chirurgien de la tête et du cou chez ENT and Allergy Associates à West Nyack, NY. Il a obtenu son diplôme de médecine au Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, a effectué sa résidence en oto-rhino-laryngologie au New York University Medical Center, et est professeur clinique adjoint à la Mount Sinai School of Medicine. Il est membre de l'American College of Surgeons et de l'American Academy of Otolaryngology.
La perspective chirurgicale de la tête et du cou du Dr Grinberg offre aux lecteurs de PureLift LAB une vision clinique élargie — reliant la pratique EMS à domicile à l'anatomie médicale sous-jacente avec la même rigueur scientifique que celle que nous appliquons à chaque spécification d'appareil.
Prof. Dr med Ivo Buschmann
Président d'Angiologie, Hochschule Medizinische Brandenburg | Directeur de clinique, Clinique universitaire d'angiologie, Hôpital universitaire de Brandebourg | Ancien consultant principal, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Read bio
Le Prof. Dr. med. Ivo Buschmann est titulaire de la chaire d'angiologie à la Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane (MHB) et directeur de la clinique universitaire d'angiologie à l'hôpital universitaire de Brandebourg. Il a effectué sa formation médicale à l'Université de Hambourg, a été boursier de la Société Max-Planck à l'Institut Max-Planck de recherche sur le cœur et les poumons, et a occupé des postes de consultant principal à la Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Virchow avant d'être nommé titulaire de la chaire à la MHB en 2016.
Le Prof. Buschmann est l'une des principales autorités européennes en arteriogenèse — la croissance et le remodelage des vaisseaux sanguins induits par le flux — avec plus de 150 publications évaluées par des pairs et plusieurs brevets américains et européens sur des dispositifs stimulant la croissance des vaisseaux collatéraux par une thérapie contrôlée du taux de cisaillement. Ses recherches relient la stimulation mécanique et électrique à l'adaptation vasculaire, à la microcirculation et à la perfusion tissulaire.
Les contributions du Prof. Buschmann apportent aux lecteurs de PureLift LAB une perspective en biologie vasculaire qui complète notre expertise clinique, en physiothérapie et en anatomie chirurgicale — expliquant comment la stimulation EMS engage non seulement les muscles faciaux mais aussi la microcirculation qui les alimente, et pourquoi une administration intelligente est aussi importante au niveau du flux sanguin qu'à celui de la contraction musculaire.
Partager
No single person invented microcurrent; it grew out of nineteenth century research into the body's own electricity, was developed for medical use in the 1960s to 1980s, moved into salon facials in the 1980s and 1990s, and became a home device in the 2000s.
This history traces the key steps, such as:
- the first measurements of electricity in the body
- early medical studies
- the move into salon facials
- the first handheld home devices
- the research and devices of today
and many more!
Where a date comes from a brand or an industry account rather than a published paper, we say so.
Key Points:
In the 1800s, the Italian scientist Carlo Matteucci was among the first to measure electrical current in injured tissue.
In 1969, Wolcott and colleagues published a study applying low current to skin ulcers, an early medical use.
In 1982, Cheng and colleagues published a laboratory study on rat skin that is still behind today's ATP claims.
Industry accounts credit Dr. Thomas Wing with an early purpose-built microcurrent instrument in the late 1970s, and describe medical use for facial nerve conditions before cosmetic use took off.
NuFACE was founded in 2005 and says it introduced the first FDA cleared handheld microcurrent devices.
The 1800s, electricity in the body
Scientists in the nineteenth century discovered that living tissue carries its own electrical signals. The Italian physiologist Carlo Matteucci is credited as one of the first to measure electrical current in injured tissue.
That idea, that the body runs on small electrical currents, is the root of every microcurrent device.
The 1960s to 1980s, medical research
Interest in low-level current for healing returned in the mid twentieth century. In 1969, Wolcott and colleagues published a study applying low current to skin ulcers.
In 1982, Cheng and colleagues published a laboratory study on how electrical currents affect ATP in rat skin. It is still the source of most ATP claims made for facial devices, covered in our ATP article.
Industry accounts credit Dr. Thomas Wing with introducing an early purpose-built microcurrent instrument in the late 1970s, with a clinical focus.
The 1980s and 1990s, from clinic to salon
Industry accounts describe physicians using microcurrent for facial nerve conditions such as Bell's palsy, and noticing that patients' faces looked more toned and lifted.
That observation pushed microcurrent into the beauty world, and by the 1990s it was a professional salon facial marketed as a non-surgical lift. What a salon facial involves today is in our facial with microcurrent article.
The 2000s, the first home devices
NuFACE's founder, Carol Cole, began her career as an esthetician in 1985. NuFACE was founded in 2005 and says it introduced the first FDA cleared handheld microcurrent devices.
NuFACE reached a mass audience through QVC in 2008 and launched the TRINITY in 2010. Its current range is reviewed in our NuFACE TRINITY+ review.
The 2010s, the first controlled trials
A randomized controlled trial by Kavanagh and colleagues, published in 2012, tested a facial electrical stimulation device over twelve weeks, giving the field controlled evidence on facial muscle toning.
The wider research picture is in our research summary.
The 2020s, more brands and more technologies
Home devices spread fast, with brands such as ZIIP, FOREO, Therabody and MyoLift. Some added nanocurrent, LED, massage or EMS. See our microcurrent vs nanocurrent article.
Our own story is in our company history article.
Our devices run nanocurrent at level 1, microcurrent at level 2 and EMS from level 3 to 10, plus an Infuse pass, on one dial, with a ten minute session and no more than three minutes per side of the face, and they work with any water-based conductive serum.
What this history means for you
Microcurrent is not new. It has decades of medical and salon use behind it.
The cosmetic claims are better supported for muscle toning than for collagen or ATP, which come from much weaker evidence.
To learn how a device works today, start with our article on what a microcurrent device is.
Do not use any facial current device if you have a pacemaker or other implanted electronic device, if you are pregnant or if you have epilepsy, and skip broken or irritated skin. The full list is in our safety article.
Frequently asked questions
Who invented microcurrent
No single person. It grew out of nineteenth century bioelectricity research, was developed for medical use from the 1960s to 1980s and moved into beauty in the 1980s and 1990s.
When did microcurrent facials start
Industry accounts place the move from medical to cosmetic use in the 1980s, with salon microcurrent facials widespread by the 1990s.
Was microcurrent first used for Bell's palsy
Industry accounts describe physicians using it for facial nerve conditions such as Bell's palsy before cosmetic use took off.
What was the first at-home microcurrent device
NuFACE, founded in 2005, says it introduced the first FDA cleared handheld microcurrent devices.
How long has microcurrent been around
Research into the body's electricity dates to the 1800s, and medical microcurrent studies date to the late 1960s.
This article sits inside our full map of the category, where we set out all 33 devices we track, what each one carries and what each brand publishes: Nine Technologies on One Dial, What the Rest of the Market Actually Carries.