Who Invented Microcurrent, the History of the Microcurrent Facial

Medically reviewed by

4 independent reviewers

Andrew Conrad Barile, Physiotherapeut, Doktor der Physiotherapie

Andrew Conrad Barile, Physiotherapeut, Doktor der Physiotherapie

Doktor der Physiotherapie (DPT), Lizenzierter Physiotherapeut (PT)

Read bio

Dr. Andrew Conrad Barile ist Doktor der Physiotherapie sowie CEO und Gründer von Xtreem Pulse LLC. Er erwarb seinen Doktortitel in Physiotherapie am Daemen College und bringt über zwei Jahrzehnte klinische und unternehmerische Erfahrung in der pädiatrischen Physiotherapie, Craniosacraltherapie und medizinischen Geräteinnovation mit. Sein tiefes Verständnis der menschlichen Anatomie, Muskelphysiologie und therapeutischen Technologie bietet einen wissenschaftlich fundierten Ansatz für Gesichtsverjüngung und Anti-Aging-Lösungen.

Bertica M. Rubio, M.D.

Bertica M. Rubio, M.D.

Medizinischer Direktor, Anti-Aging-Regenerationsmedizinische Klinik | Facharzt | Dartmouth Medical School

Read bio

Dr. Bertica M. Rubio ist eine zertifizierte Ärztin und medizinische Leiterin der Anti-Aging-Regenerationsklinik in Redlands, Kalifornien. Sie erwarb ihren Bachelor of Science an der Loyola Marymount University und ihren Doktortitel in Medizin an der Dartmouth Medical School (Geisel School of Medicine). Ihre Facharztausbildung in Pädiatrie absolvierte sie am UC Irvine Medical Center.

Mit jahrzehntelanger klinischer Erfahrung spezialisiert sich Dr. Rubio auf Altersmanagement, regenerative Medizin, Wundheilung und Wachstumsfaktor-Therapien. Ihre Praxis verbindet evidenzbasierte medizinische Wissenschaft mit fortschrittlichen ästhetischen und regenerativen Behandlungen, um Patienten zu optimaler Gesundheit und jugendlicher Vitalität zu verhelfen.

Dr. Rubio ist leidenschaftlich daran interessiert, Patienten über die Wissenschaft hinter Hautpflege, Gesichtsverjüngung und nicht-invasiven Technologien wie EMS (Elektrische Muskelstimulation) zur Gesichtstonung aufzuklären. Ihre Artikel für PureLift LAB verbinden fundiertes medizinisches Wissen mit praktischen Anleitungen für echte, nachhaltige Ergebnisse.

Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS

Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS

Facharzt für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde und Kopf-Hals-Chirurgie | Fellow des American College of Surgeons | Assistenz-Professor für Klinische Medizin, Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Read bio

Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS, ist ein von der Ärztekammer zertifizierter Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Arzt und Kopf-Hals-Chirurg bei ENT and Allergy Associates in West Nyack, NY. Er erwarb seinen medizinischen Abschluss an der Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, absolvierte seine Facharztausbildung in Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde am New York University Medical Center und ist Assistenzprofessor an der Mount Sinai School of Medicine. Er ist Fellow sowohl des American College of Surgeons als auch der American Academy of Otolaryngology.

Dr. Grinbergs Perspektive als Kopf-Hals-Chirurg bietet den Lesern von PureLift LAB eine erweiterte klinische Sichtweise — er verbindet die EMS-Anwendung zu Hause mit der zugrunde liegenden medizinischen Anatomie mit derselben wissenschaftlichen Genauigkeit, die wir auf jede Gerätespezifikation anwenden.

Prof. Dr. med. Ivo Buschmann

Prof. Dr. med. Ivo Buschmann

Lehrstuhl für Angiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg | Klinikdirektor, Universitätsklinik für Angiologie, Brandenburgisches Klinikum | Ehemaliger Oberarzt, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin

Read bio

Prof. Dr. med. Ivo Buschmann ist Lehrstuhlinhaber für Angiologie an der Medizinischen Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane (MHB) und Klinikdirektor der Universitätsklinik für Angiologie am Brandenburgischen Universitätsklinikum. Er absolvierte seine medizinische Ausbildung an der Universität Hamburg, war Max-Planck-Gesellschaft-Stipendiat am Max-Planck-Institut für Herz- und Lungenforschung und hatte leitende Oberarztpositionen an der Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Virchow inne, bevor er 2016 zum Lehrstuhlinhaber an der MHB berufen wurde.

Prof. Buschmann ist einer der führenden europäischen Experten für Arteriogenese – das durch Fluss angetriebene Wachstum und die Umgestaltung von Blutgefäßen – mit mehr als 150 begutachteten Veröffentlichungen und mehreren US- und EU-Patenten für Geräte, die das Wachstum von Kollateralgefäßen durch kontrollierte Scherkräfte-Therapie stimulieren. Seine Forschung verbindet mechanische und elektrische Stimulation mit vaskulärer Anpassung, Mikrozirkulation und Gewebeperfusion.

Die Beiträge von Prof. Buschmann bieten den Lesern von PureLift LAB eine gefäßbiologische Perspektive, die unsere bestehenden Autoren aus den Bereichen Klinik, Physiotherapie und chirurgische Anatomie ergänzt – und erklären, wie EMS-Stimulation nicht nur die Gesichtsmuskeln, sondern auch die Mikrozirkulation, die sie versorgt, aktiviert und warum eine intelligente Anwendung auf der Ebene des Blutflusses ebenso wichtig ist wie die Muskelkontraktion.

What's This About:

No single person invented microcurrent; it grew out of nineteenth century research into the body's own electricity, was developed for medical use in the 1960s to 1980s, moved into salon facials in the 1980s and 1990s, and became a home device in the 2000s.

This history traces the key steps, such as:

- the first measurements of electricity in the body

- early medical studies

- the move into salon facials

- the first handheld home devices

- the research and devices of today

and many more!

Where a date comes from a brand or an industry account rather than a published paper, we say so.

Key Points:

In the 1800s, the Italian scientist Carlo Matteucci was among the first to measure electrical current in injured tissue.

In 1969, Wolcott and colleagues published a study applying low current to skin ulcers, an early medical use.

In 1982, Cheng and colleagues published a laboratory study on rat skin that is still behind today's ATP claims.

Industry accounts credit Dr. Thomas Wing with an early purpose-built microcurrent instrument in the late 1970s, and describe medical use for facial nerve conditions before cosmetic use took off.

NuFACE was founded in 2005 and says it introduced the first FDA cleared handheld microcurrent devices.

The 1800s, electricity in the body

Scientists in the nineteenth century discovered that living tissue carries its own electrical signals. The Italian physiologist Carlo Matteucci is credited as one of the first to measure electrical current in injured tissue.

That idea, that the body runs on small electrical currents, is the root of every microcurrent device.

The 1960s to 1980s, medical research

Interest in low-level current for healing returned in the mid twentieth century. In 1969, Wolcott and colleagues published a study applying low current to skin ulcers.

In 1982, Cheng and colleagues published a laboratory study on how electrical currents affect ATP in rat skin. It is still the source of most ATP claims made for facial devices, covered in our ATP article.

Industry accounts credit Dr. Thomas Wing with introducing an early purpose-built microcurrent instrument in the late 1970s, with a clinical focus.

The 1980s and 1990s, from clinic to salon

Industry accounts describe physicians using microcurrent for facial nerve conditions such as Bell's palsy, and noticing that patients' faces looked more toned and lifted.

That observation pushed microcurrent into the beauty world, and by the 1990s it was a professional salon facial marketed as a non-surgical lift. What a salon facial involves today is in our facial with microcurrent article.

The 2000s, the first home devices

NuFACE's founder, Carol Cole, began her career as an esthetician in 1985. NuFACE was founded in 2005 and says it introduced the first FDA cleared handheld microcurrent devices.

NuFACE reached a mass audience through QVC in 2008 and launched the TRINITY in 2010. Its current range is reviewed in our NuFACE TRINITY+ review.

The 2010s, the first controlled trials

A randomized controlled trial by Kavanagh and colleagues, published in 2012, tested a facial electrical stimulation device over twelve weeks, giving the field controlled evidence on facial muscle toning.

The wider research picture is in our research summary.

The 2020s, more brands and more technologies

Home devices spread fast, with brands such as ZIIP, FOREO, Therabody and MyoLift. Some added nanocurrent, LED, massage or EMS. See our microcurrent vs nanocurrent article.

Our own story is in our company history article.

Our devices run nanocurrent at level 1, microcurrent at level 2 and EMS from level 3 to 10, plus an Infuse pass, on one dial, with a ten minute session and no more than three minutes per side of the face, and they work with any water-based conductive serum.

What this history means for you

Microcurrent is not new. It has decades of medical and salon use behind it.

The cosmetic claims are better supported for muscle toning than for collagen or ATP, which come from much weaker evidence.

To learn how a device works today, start with our article on what a microcurrent device is.

Do not use any facial current device if you have a pacemaker or other implanted electronic device, if you are pregnant or if you have epilepsy, and skip broken or irritated skin. The full list is in our safety article.

Frequently asked questions

Who invented microcurrent

No single person. It grew out of nineteenth century bioelectricity research, was developed for medical use from the 1960s to 1980s and moved into beauty in the 1980s and 1990s.

When did microcurrent facials start

Industry accounts place the move from medical to cosmetic use in the 1980s, with salon microcurrent facials widespread by the 1990s.

Was microcurrent first used for Bell's palsy

Industry accounts describe physicians using it for facial nerve conditions such as Bell's palsy before cosmetic use took off.

What was the first at-home microcurrent device

NuFACE, founded in 2005, says it introduced the first FDA cleared handheld microcurrent devices.

How long has microcurrent been around

Research into the body's electricity dates to the 1800s, and medical microcurrent studies date to the late 1960s.

This article sits inside our full map of the category, where we set out all 33 devices we track, what each one carries and what each brand publishes: Nine Technologies on One Dial, What the Rest of the Market Actually Carries.

Zurück zum Blog