Facial EMS in a Treatment Room, What Estheticians Should Evaluate

Facial EMS in a Treatment Room, What Estheticians Should Evaluate

Medically reviewed by

4 independent reviewers

Andrew Conrad Barile, PT, DPT

Andrew Conrad Barile, PT, DPT

Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) | Licensed Physical Therapist (PT) | CEO and Founder, Xtreem Pulse LLC

Read bio

Dr. Andrew Conrad Barile is a Doctor of Physical Therapy and the CEO and Founder of Xtreem Pulse LLC, the engineering company behind PureLift. He earned his Doctorate in Physical Therapy from Daemen College and is a licensed physical therapist.

He brings over two decades of clinical and entrepreneurial experience across physical therapy, craniosacral therapy and medical device innovation, built on a working knowledge of human anatomy and muscle physiology.

For PureLift LAB he reviews how current is delivered across all ten levels, from sub-sensory nanocurrent and skin-level microcurrent to motor-level EMS, and how the Infuse pass fits into the same ten-minute routine.

Bertica M. Rubio, M.D.

Bertica M. Rubio, M.D.

Board-Certified Physician, Dartmouth Medical School | Medical Director, Antiaging Regenerative Medicine Clinic

Read bio

Dr. Bertica M. Rubio is a board-certified physician and Medical Director of the Antiaging Regenerative Medicine Clinic in Redlands, California. She earned her Doctor of Medicine from Dartmouth Medical School and completed her pediatrics residency at UC Irvine Medical Center.

With decades of clinical experience, she specialises in age management medicine, regenerative medicine, wound healing and growth factor therapies, and her practice integrates evidence-based medical science with advanced aesthetic treatment.

For PureLift LAB she reviews articles for medical accuracy across the whole dial, from the gentle nanocurrent and microcurrent settings through to muscle-level EMS and the Infuse pass.

Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS

Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS

Board-Certified Otolaryngologist | Head and Neck Surgeon | Fellow, American College of Surgeons | Mount Sinai

Read bio

Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS is a board-certified otolaryngologist and head and neck surgeon at ENT and Allergy Associates in West Nyack, New York. He earned his medical degree from Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons.

He completed his otolaryngology residency at New York University Medical Center, serves as Assistant Clinical Professor at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, and is a Fellow of both the American College of Surgeons and the American Academy of Otolaryngology.

For PureLift LAB he brings a wider clinical lens, connecting at-home facial stimulation from microcurrent to EMS to the anatomy underneath, with the same rigour we apply to every device specification.

Prof. Dr. med. Ivo Buschmann

Prof. Dr. med. Ivo Buschmann

Chair of Angiology, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg | Clinic Director, University Clinic for Angiology

Read bio

Prof. Dr. med. Ivo Buschmann is Chair of Angiology at the Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane and Clinic Director of the University Clinic for Angiology at the Brandenburg University Hospital.

He trained at the University of Hamburg, was a Max Planck Society Fellow at the Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, and held senior consultant posts at the Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin before his appointment as Chair in 2016.

One of Europe's leading authorities on arteriogenesis, with over 150 peer-reviewed publications and US and EU patents, he reviews for PureLift LAB how the evidence on electrical stimulation is read and where its limits lie.

What's This About:

A practitioner evaluating a stimulation device needs answers a consumer review never covers: verifiable output, cleared indications, room turnover and what can honestly be said to a client.

This article explains what is actually happening, such as:

- Start with scope of practice

- Ask for numbers you can verify

- Check the clearance yourself

- Room economics

- What you can honestly tell a client

and many more!

We make PureLift, so this is an interested checklist; every item on it applies whichever brand you end up buying.

Key Points:

Ask for maximum current and the impedance it was measured at; a bare milliamp figure is half a number.

Check the 510(k) record yourself rather than accepting a clearance claim from a sales sheet.

A ten minute session with three minutes per side maximum fits inside a treatment block without dominating it.

A device requiring a proprietary gel carries a per-treatment cost that a device taking any water-based serum does not.

Confirm your local scope of practice before offering any electrical modality.

Start with scope of practice

What an esthetician may legally operate differs by state and by country, and some electrical modalities sit outside esthetics scope in places where others sit comfortably inside it.

That question is settled by your licensing board, not by a manufacturer, and no sales conversation substitutes for checking it. A device you cannot legally use is an expensive shelf ornament and, worse, an insurance problem.

Check your professional indemnity cover as well, since some policies name modalities explicitly.

Ask for numbers you can verify

Maximum current, and the impedance it was measured at. Current depends on the resistance it meets, so a figure with no stated load cannot be compared with anything.

Pulse width, because charge delivered depends on how long each pulse lasts as well as how high it goes.

Whether the frequency is fixed or varied, since a fixed frequency accommodates faster across a longer session.

For reference, PureLift publishes 7 mA at 500 ohms for Face and Pro with a 4 microsecond pulse, 7.7 mA for Pro Edition, and 9 mA for Pro Plus and GLOW, with PDM cycling 361 points between 1,370 and 1,730 Hz.

A supplier who cannot answer those three questions is asking you to take the performance on trust in front of a paying client.

Check the clearance yourself

Clearance numbers are public and searchable. PureLift's are K190269 for Face, K230506 for Pro and Pro Edition, K221443 for Pro Plus and K243587 for GLOW.

Read what the clearance actually covers, because the cleared indication is the boundary of what you can claim in your treatment menu. GLOW's light, for instance, covers mild to moderate inflammatory acne and is not indicated for severe or cystic acne, and must not be used over the eyes or eyelids.

A claim beyond the cleared indication is a regulatory exposure that sits with you, not with the manufacturer.

Room economics

A ten minute session with a maximum of three minutes per side slots inside a facial rather than replacing it, which matters when you are pricing a treatment block.

Consumables are the figure that decides margin. A device requiring a proprietary gel at $30 to $130 a bottle carries a per-treatment cost; a device that works with any water-based serum lets you use whatever your back bar already stocks.

Cleaning between clients, charging, and how many handpieces you need across rooms are the unglamorous questions that decide whether the device gets used on a busy day.

What you can honestly tell a client

Kavanagh and colleagues measured an 18.6 percent increase in cheek muscle thickness over 12 weeks with motor-level facial stimulation across 108 women (10.1111/jocd.12007). Chang and colleagues ran a double-blind sham-controlled trial (10.3390/ijerph17113783), and Kwak and colleagues used a split-face design (10.52660/jksc.2023.29.6.1505).

Those are category studies rather than trials of any one device, and the honest framing to a client is that this is what the category of stimulation has been shown to do under study conditions, over a season, not what this machine will do to their face by Friday.

Clients respond better to that framing than to a promise, and it protects you when a result takes longer than they hoped.

Setting expectations on timeline

The immediate effect after a session is drainage and circulation, which makes the face look fresher for a few hours; say so, because a client who thinks that is the result will be disappointed the next morning.

The cumulative work is measured in months, which means a course rather than a single appointment, and that conversation is better had at the consultation than at treatment four.

Photograph in consistent light at the start and monthly thereafter; it protects both of you.

Trying before buying

Use it on yourself first, for a month. You will learn more about contact, glide and where the level sits comfortably than any demonstration teaches, and you will be able to answer a client's questions from experience rather than from a brochure.

For the full breakdown of which technology sits where on the dial, see how the nine PureLift technologies work.

Back to blog