PureLift Face vs NuFACE Trinity+, $499 vs $395 Compared Honestly
Medically reviewed by
4 independent reviewers
Andrew Conrad Barile, PT, DPT
Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) | Licensed Physical Therapist (PT) | CEO and Founder, Xtreem Pulse LLC
Read bio
Dr. Andrew Conrad Barile is a Doctor of Physical Therapy and the CEO and Founder of Xtreem Pulse LLC, the engineering company behind PureLift. He earned his Doctorate in Physical Therapy from Daemen College and is a licensed physical therapist.
He brings over two decades of clinical and entrepreneurial experience across physical therapy, craniosacral therapy and medical device innovation, built on a working knowledge of human anatomy and muscle physiology.
For PureLift LAB he reviews how current is delivered across all ten levels, from sub-sensory nanocurrent and skin-level microcurrent to motor-level EMS, and how the Infuse pass fits into the same ten-minute routine.
Bertica M. Rubio, M.D.
Board-Certified Physician, Dartmouth Medical School | Medical Director, Antiaging Regenerative Medicine Clinic
Read bio
Dr. Bertica M. Rubio is a board-certified physician and Medical Director of the Antiaging Regenerative Medicine Clinic in Redlands, California. She earned her Doctor of Medicine from Dartmouth Medical School and completed her pediatrics residency at UC Irvine Medical Center.
With decades of clinical experience, she specialises in age management medicine, regenerative medicine, wound healing and growth factor therapies, and her practice integrates evidence-based medical science with advanced aesthetic treatment.
For PureLift LAB she reviews articles for medical accuracy across the whole dial, from the gentle nanocurrent and microcurrent settings through to muscle-level EMS and the Infuse pass.
Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS
Board-Certified Otolaryngologist | Head and Neck Surgeon | Fellow, American College of Surgeons | Mount Sinai
Read bio
Daniel Grinberg, MD, FACS is a board-certified otolaryngologist and head and neck surgeon at ENT and Allergy Associates in West Nyack, New York. He earned his medical degree from Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons.
He completed his otolaryngology residency at New York University Medical Center, serves as Assistant Clinical Professor at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, and is a Fellow of both the American College of Surgeons and the American Academy of Otolaryngology.
For PureLift LAB he brings a wider clinical lens, connecting at-home facial stimulation from microcurrent to EMS to the anatomy underneath, with the same rigour we apply to every device specification.
Prof. Dr. med. Ivo Buschmann
Chair of Angiology, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg | Clinic Director, University Clinic for Angiology
Read bio
Prof. Dr. med. Ivo Buschmann is Chair of Angiology at the Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane and Clinic Director of the University Clinic for Angiology at the Brandenburg University Hospital.
He trained at the University of Hamburg, was a Max Planck Society Fellow at the Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, and held senior consultant posts at the Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin before his appointment as Chair in 2016.
One of Europe's leading authorities on arteriogenesis, with over 150 peer-reviewed publications and US and EU patents, he reviews for PureLift LAB how the evidence on electrical stimulation is read and where its limits lie.
Share
NuFACE Trinity+ at $395 and PureLift Face at $499 are the closest match in price, and both give you microcurrent, but only one of them keeps going into the muscle underneath.
This article compares the two devices on the things that decide what you see in the mirror, such as:
- What Trinity+ does well, and where its current stops
- Why PureLift Face runs microcurrent too, at level 2 of ten
- What the eight levels above microcurrent are for
- What the Infuse pass does for the serum you already own
- What each device costs to keep using after the box
and many more!
By the end you will know which of the two matches the change you are trying to make.
Key Points:
NuFACE Trinity+ costs $395 and delivers between 170 and 200 microamps, which stays below the level that moves a facial muscle.
PureLift Face costs $499 and delivers up to 7 milliamps, running microcurrent at level 2 and muscle-engaging EMS from level 3 to level 10.
Both devices give you microcurrent; only PureLift also has nanocurrent below it and EMS above it.
Face also has Infuse, a second pass that supports absorption of the serum on your skin, and it works with any water-based serum rather than a gel you must rebuy.
No trial has compared these two devices, so this is about documented capability rather than a head-to-head result.
NuFACE is the name most people meet first, and there is a good reason for that: Trinity+ is a well-made device with a large following and a genuine track record in the microcurrent category.
At $395 for the starter kit it also sits close enough to PureLift Face at $499 for the comparison to be fair, which is why this article puts those two side by side rather than borrowing figures from a $999 flagship.
The question is not whether microcurrent works, because it does; the question is what each device is allowed to do once the current is switched on.
What Trinity+ does, and where it stops
Trinity+ is a microcurrent device, and microcurrent is measured in millionths of an amp.
NuFACE does not publish an output figure on its own website, so the number in this comparison, between 170 and 200 microamps, comes from its FDA clearance summary.
At that scale the current is talking to skin cells rather than to the nerves that drive muscle, and the research behind that territory is real: laboratory work shows defined small currents change how skin cells behave, and small facial studies report improvements in wrinkle scores, dermal density and texture (Saniee 2012).
Pooled randomised trials in wound care covering seven studies and 337 people found that adding microcurrent to standard care helped wounds close faster (Avendano-Coy 2022), which is the strongest clinical support the low-current category has.
What none of that research shows is a muscle moving, because at microamp levels the muscle is not being asked to do anything, and that is the boundary of the category rather than a fault in the device.
PureLift Face has microcurrent too, at level 2
PureLift Face has ten levels on one dial, and the first two cover the territory Trinity+ occupies.
Level 1 is nanocurrent, billionths of an amp, below the level you can feel, which makes it the setting for a reactive day or the thin skin around the eyes, and Trinity+ has no equivalent.
Level 2 is microcurrent, the same gentle skin-level current Trinity+ is built around, so if a microcurrent routine is what you came for, Face already has it.
Levels 3 to 10 are EMS, and that is where the two devices stop being versions of the same thing.
The eight levels above microcurrent
Electrical muscle stimulation delivers enough current to fire the nerve that drives a facial muscle, and you can watch it happen in the mirror.
Around forty small muscles sit under the skin of your face, held inside a connected sheet called the SMAS, and engaging them repeatedly is how EMS supports a firmer, more defined look along the jaw, cheeks and neck.
In the largest facial trial of its kind, 108 women used facial muscle stimulation daily for twelve weeks and ultrasound measured an 18.6 percent increase in cheek-muscle thickness, with a clear difference from the untreated group at six weeks (Kavanagh 2012).
A double-blind trial against a dummy device that looked identical found muscle thickness and bite force increased after six weeks (Chang 2020), which is the strictest test design this field has.
One split-face study makes the division of labour plain, because the microcurrent side improved eye-wrinkle volume and dermal density while the EMS side improved lifting measures, which is two currents doing two different jobs on one face (Kwak 2023).
Those are category studies using their own devices, so they show what facial muscle stimulation can do rather than what PureLift Face did for anyone in particular.
Strength, in context
Trinity+ reaches between 170 and 200 microamps and PureLift Face reaches 7 milliamps, which is 7,000 microamps, so the difference in maximum output is roughly thirty-five times.
That ratio matters less than what it crosses, because the useful boundary is the point where the nerve fires the muscle rather than any particular number.
Output figures are measured at 500 ohms and consumer copy says up to, because the current that actually reaches you depends on contact, placement and your own skin.
What Face adds after the muscle work
Face has a second mode called Infuse, run after the Lift pass with your serum still on, and Trinity+ has no equivalent at any setting.
Infuse is built on the delivery science of electroporation, where brief electrical pulses were shown to open temporary routes through the skin's outer barrier (Prausnitz 1993) and to enhance vitamin C penetration in human skin (Zhang 1999).
On Face it is a gentle second pass that supports absorption of the serum already on your skin, and we say supports absorption and no more, because no product-specific penetration study exists.
So the $499 device carries four technologies on one handheld: nanocurrent, microcurrent, EMS and absorption.
The cost after the box
Both devices need a conductive medium on the skin, so the purchase price is not the whole cost.
NuFACE sells its own activator gels from $35 a bottle and positions the gel as an essential step in the routine.
PureLift works with any water-based serum, including the one already on your shelf, and ships with a bottle of Activator Serum to start, so the running cost stays in your hands.
Trinity+ also has an optional companion app, while Face has ten levels on a dial and nothing to pair.
Where Trinity+ has the edge
NuFACE sells attachment heads for Trinity+, including a red-light attachment, and light is the one thing Face leaves to GLOW further up the range.
If light therapy is a large part of what you are shopping for, that attachment is worth weighing against GLOW at $999, which carries red at 634 nm, blue at 465 nm and purple for both at once on the handpiece itself.
Trinity+ is also the more familiar name, with a longer high-street presence, and that counts for something when you want a device your facialist recognises.
Three minutes on each side
Three minutes on each side of the face, at a level where you can see the muscle answer, and the difference is visible in the mirror: a fresher, more lifted-looking face, because the muscles have worked and blood is flowing.
That first effect is temporary, like the glow after a walk, and it comes back every session, while the lasting change follows the research clock at six and twelve weeks of daily use.
The full PureLift session runs ten minutes and switches itself off, and a Trinity+ session runs five.
Which one to buy
Buy NuFACE Trinity+ if microcurrent is genuinely all you want, if the app and the attachment system appeal, and if the $100 saving matters more to you than the muscle layer.
Buy PureLift Face if you want that same microcurrent routine at level 2, the eight levels above it where the muscles that hold your face up are asked to work, and the Infuse pass for your serum afterwards.
For an extra $100 you are not buying a better microcurrent device, you are buying a device that does microcurrent and then keeps going, which is a different purchase.
If you were looking at the Trinity+ Complete Set at $595 rather than the starter kit, the price-matched PureLift is Pro at $699, the same four technologies at the same 7 milliamps in the slim professional pen the treatment rooms use.
Step up beyond that only if a specific need justifies it: Pro Edition at $799 for more room at the top of the dial, Pro Plus + at $899 for the strongest output in the range at 9 milliamps, or GLOW at $999 if breakouts and fine lines sit alongside the sagging, because GLOW adds red, blue and purple light.
No randomised trial has compared PureLift with NuFACE, so this recommendation rests on what each device is documented to do rather than on a head-to-head result.
PureLift Face is cleared through the FDA 510(k) pathway under record K190269 and made in Japan in an ISO 13485 facility, and clearance is a safety review rather than an endorsement of results.
For the level-by-level sensations, read what a session feels like, and for the full Face write-up, read the PureLift Face review.
Prices and competitor specifications verified on 8 September 2026 against NuFACE's own website and its FDA clearance summary, and the PureLift LAB store. NuFACE does not publish an output figure on its product pages, so the 170 to 200 microamp range comes from its FDA document. PureLift Face output stated as up to 7 mA measured at 500 ohms, FDA record K190269.
This comparison sits inside our full map of the category, where we set out all 33 devices we track, what each one carries and what each brand publishes: Nine Technologies on One Dial, What the Rest of the Market Actually Carries.